European Union: EC plans to attack double taxation and double non-taxation in 2012

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Union: EC plans to attack double taxation and double non-taxation in 2012

On November 11 2011, the European Commission (EC) outlined its 2012 strategy for combating double taxation and double non-taxation in the EU.

Regarding double taxation, the EC proposes to strengthen existing EU tax policy instruments such as the EU’s interest and royalties (I&R) directive and the arbitration convention on transfer pricing, and implement an EU-wide common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB). It also wants to extend the coverage and the scope of double tax conventions (DTC), ensure more consistent interpretation and application of DTC provisions, and beef up and accelerate dispute resolution within the EU. It proposes to strengthen the I&R directive by:

  • Extending the list of companies covered;

  • Reducing the shareholding requirements to be met for companies to qualify as associated (from 25% to 10%);

  • Requiring the recipient of a tax exemption to be subject to CIT in the member state of his establishment on the income derived from the interest or royalty payment; and

  • Avoiding that payments made by a permanent establishment (PE) and deriving from its activities are denied a tax exemption on the grounds that they do not constitute a tax deductible expense.

Probably of greater importance to multinational businesses, however, is that the EC has also announced that it will launch a public consultation on situations of double non-taxation in the EU. The EC wants to analyse the full scale of this issue, which according to the Commission causes considerable losses to public revenues in Europe, and then, based on this preliminary analysis, propose appropriate and effective measures to the EU’s Council (the 27 member state governments) for preventing double non-taxation in 2012.

The EU’s code of conduct group on business taxation (which is an EU Council working group for discussions between national government representatives and the EC in a peer pressure, non-legally binding setting) has been discussing the issue of profit participating loans and hybrid entities for a number of years now. On October 20 2011, the code of conduct group reached broad consensus that this issue reflects inefficiency in Europe’s internal market, and invited the EC to come forward with a legislative proposal in 2012. The group will, however, still need to agree on whether they want the EC to table a hard law or soft law EU proposal on double non-taxation. The EC’s announcement of the public consultation must therefore be seen as a first step. The Commission’s Working Party 4 will discuss this issue in January 2012 and the public consultation is expected to be launched in the first quarter of 2012.

The above developments are closely connected to the international debate on aggressive tax planning. Algirdas Šemeta, the EU’s commissioner for taxation, and many MEPs, has said that aggressive tax planning in the EU is perhaps not illegal but definitely undesirable in the current climate.

The public consultation on double non-taxation was actually first suggested to the EC in March 2011 by Sharon Bowles, MEP, chairwoman of the EU Parliament’s powerful Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee (ECON). Bowles kept open the possibility of anonymous submissions to “allow active members of industry to contribute”. Pressure is also on the code of conduct group to agree to follow through on tackling double taxation. This development shows again the clout the European Parliament, and leading individual MEPs, has on direct tax policymaking in the EU, since the entry into force of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty in December 2009.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com), Brussels and Amsterdam

PwC

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
Gift this article