Telefónica hit with $740 million tax charge in Peru

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Telefónica hit with $740 million tax charge in Peru

Telefónica is locked in a dispute with the Peruvian government over unpaid taxes.

The authorities claim the Spanish telecommunications company’s Peruvian unit owes back taxes of about S2 billion ($740 million). Telefónica rejects this view.

The Wall Street Journal has reported that Peruvian President Ollanta Humala is unhappy that the company has taken the dispute for arbitration at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).

"We understand that this theme is in the judicial system and we have to respect that, but evidently for us this is a concern that large companies that have been many years in Peru are taking legal actions against the state, that it is in a contentious process against the state for tax payments," Humala said.

However, Telefónica denied using the ICSID, saying it has approached Peru’s Ministry of Finance to settle the dispute instead.

The company believes the dispute is connected to government taxes levied on unpaid client accounts and the fact that the government will not recognise costs for interest payments.

"In both cases rights that have been recognised for other companies aren't being recognised for Telefónica," the company says. "Moreover, more than 80% of the amount in dispute with the (tax collection agency) Sunat corresponds to fines and interest."

The company adds that it paid an average effective tax rate of 51% of its profits from 1998 to 2005. "The position of Sunat in this controversy would in practice give Telefónica del Peru an average effective tax rate on income tax of 71% of profits in the same period," it said.

One lawmaker wants Telefónica to be shut out of the mobile communications market in Peru unless it pays what the government claims it owes.

Jaime Delgado, president of the consumer rights committee in the legislature, said the company’s licences for its Movistar mobile services should not be renewed if it does not pay up.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article