Brazil: Court decides on third-party freight and insurance issues

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Court decides on third-party freight and insurance issues

As widely known, Brazil's transfer pricing rules do not adopt the internationally accepted arm's-length standard.

For instance, for the purposes of applying the Brazilian equivalent to the resale price method (PRL) in transactions involving import of goods between related parties abroad, regulations provide the use of statutory fixed margins to derive a benchmark ceiling price. In these instances, actual transfer pricing practiced by the local tested party must be lower than that derived benchmark price, otherwise tax authorities will impose a transfer pricing adjustment.

In addition to the potential double taxation issues resulting from the non-adoption of the arm's-length standard, there are many controversial legal issues that have been disputed by taxpayers and tax authorities, since rules became effective on January 1 1997. One of the most controversial issues is whether third party insurance and freight services fees, as well as Brazilian import duties, should or should not be included as an integral part of import costs to determine the actual transfer price practiced by a tested party. In many situations such amounts increase actual transfer prices to levels beyond benchmark prices. As a result, arguing that these adjustments are mandatory, tax authorities have been imposing tax assessments against many taxpayers.

Disputing the issue, taxpayers alleged that transfer pricing regulations do not provide that such adjustment is mandatory and that it should not be performed if insurance and freight services are contracted with third unrelated parties. On the other hand, the tax authorities argued that regulations impose such adjustment even if payments are made to third parties, as the only required condition is that the tested party ultimately bears the cost associated with those services.

In a recent decision, the Brazilian Administrative Court (CARF) ruled in favour of the taxpayer. By examining the case, CARF officials decided that insurance and freight services fees, as well as Brazilian import duties, should not be included in the calculations to assess the transfer price practiced by the tested party.

The decision was celebrated by taxpayers in general, though it cannot be used as mandatory precedent to other taxpayers.

Nélio Weiss (nelio.weiss@br.pwc.com) & Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674 2271

Fax: +55 11 3674 2040

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
The big four firm is consolidating 16 entities across the region to create a single 6,000-partner behemoth
Brazil’s tax reform unifies consumption taxes to simplify rules, centralise administration and reduce legal uncertainty
The ever-expansive firm has once again attracted a former ‘big four’ talent to lead the new offering
The amended double taxation avoidance agreement removes France’s most favoured nation status for tax treaty benefits
The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
Gift this article