This content is from: Home

The consequences of estimating assumed obligations

On September 23, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal released the highly anticipated decision in Daishowa-Marubeni. Doug Richardson and Julie D’Avignon of Stikeman Elliott explain why the decision is of particular interest to every mining, energy and forestry company that has bought or sold assets in circumstances where reclamation or reforestation obligations were assumed by the purchaser as part of the sale.

Get Free Access to read more …

Read the full article and get instant full access for free

Get Free Access
  • Full free access for a week in a few clicks
  • No commitments, no payment details
  • Feauturing transfer pricing analysis

Are you ITR or TP week subscriber? Please log in.

Related