How information exchange will benefit taxpayers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How information exchange will benefit taxpayers

Taxpayers will have to put up with an increased compliance burden as global efforts to improve information exchange grow, but the benefits are just around the corner, say international specialists.

Panellists in yesterday’s International Information Sharing: Treaties, TIEAs, and Joint Audits session at the Tax Executives Institute’s annual conference in San Franciscoexplained that joint efforts to enhance sharing of tax information should not be seen as a negative for taxpayers.

“There is going to be an increase in compliance as authorities get used to swapping information but once this becomes the norm, then it will generate a great deal of benefits over time for companies and tax authorities,” said Terrance McAuley, assistant commissioner, compliance programs, Canada Revenue Agency.

The panel concluded that the main benefit would be the removal of unnecessary tax investigations.

And with organisations such as the OECD, European Commission, the countries of the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre and national tax administrations all working together, the panel explained that with increased information exchange, officials would be able to use their time better and only target companies that are violating tax laws.

“There is a suspicion among revenue departments that every business move is done for tax purposes,” said Mary Bennett, Baker & McKenzie, Washington, DC, who has just stepped down as head of the OECD’s tax treaties and transfer pricing unit. “But if tax authorities share more information then they will soon realise that all is above board and so there is no need to bother taxpayers.”

Judith Knott, director of business taxes at HM Revenue and Customs in the UK, said the amount of commitment shown by governments and tax authorities is something to be proud of.

“With information exchange being high on the agenda of tax authorities around the world, this is forcing interested parties to come up with innovative ways to improve information exchange,” said Knott.

However, Knott did warn that it might be a little while before the benefits to taxpayers become obvious.

“Tax authorities are under pressure to do more with fewer resources so we find it hard to dedicate time and effort into this but it is definitely something we will soon be dedicating more resources too,” said Knott.

The panel raised the issue of confidentiality of exchanging tax information.

“The key thing for any tax department is maintaining confidentiality,” said McAuley. “We focus on the destination of the tax information, this is a big thing for us. Taxpayers should be secure in knowing that privacy is key when swapping information.”

This news comes as the OECD confirmed last week that international efforts to clamp down on tax evasion have drawn in €14 billion ($19 billion) from would-be tax evaders.







more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article