Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

japan.jpg

Yasutoshi Nishimura, Japan’s Deputy Economy Minister, is the latest government figure to join the calls for a corporate tax rate reduction.

The Shinzo Abe cabinet has already approved a reform plan that would end the 2011 special corporate tax surcharge in March this year – a year ahead of schedule.

This will see the country’s tax on corporate profits drop from 38% to 35.6%, but Nishimura and others want to see it cut further. Nishimura has called for the corporate tax rate to be cut to less than 30% to boost Japan’s competitiveness in the global market.

“I’d like to see deeper corporate tax cuts in the special economic zones,” said Nishimura.

The government is loosening regulations on companies operating in such zones, and a lower corporate tax rate for these regions could be another measure introduced.

“I want to show the direction of special zone tax reductions,” said Nishimura, who repeated his preference for a move to 30% before implementing further reductions down the line.

Revenue neutral approach possible

Akihiro Hironaka, partner at Nishimura & Asahi, points out that removing certain tax preferences that he considers give unequal treatment to different taxpayers, would harvest sufficient revenue to cut the corporate tax rate.

“It appears to me that many outdated special taxation measures, which are more generous to manufacturers than to service providers and retailers, should be abolished, as it is problematic in terms of equal treatment to taxpayers,” said Hironaka. “If the government abolishes these special taxation measures, it will generate substantial government revenues which enable the government to make corporate tax reductions.”

However, achieving the repeal of such provisions may be tougher than expected, due to the likelihood of intense lobbying efforts from those presently benefitting from the measures.

“It will not be easy because industry sectors that have benefited from these special taxation measures will resist strongly,” said Hironaka.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
The firm’s board has reportedly asked Kevin Burrowes to continue until 2028 as the KPMG Australia scandal raises expectations of regulatory reform
A former Deloitte partner will lead the firm’s latest geographic expansion; in other news, Baker McKenzie added six tax lawyers to its partnership
The Fair Tax Mark now extends to domestic-only companies with turnover above €1m, with Thai travel operator Tripseed the first to be certified
A technology provider had to be educated on technical requirements by Joseph Ribkoff’s IT team, a tax manager at the company said
But businesses should remain flexible when choosing between internal and external resources to handle added ViDA complexity, ITR’s Indirect Tax forum also heard
Non-compliance from small businesses continues to account for most of the gap, HM Revenue and Customs revealed
The new managing director of R&D tax relief consultancy ForrestBrown tells ITR about his priorities for the business, where he’s focusing his time and what makes tax cool
PwC Australia’s response to its tax leaks scandal could give KPMG a useful case study, but so far there’s little sign of positive lessons learned
Tom Goldstein’s attempt to overturn his tax conviction was shot down; in other news, Deloitte promoted several tax partners in Italy
Gift this article