BEPS is centre stage

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

BEPS is centre stage

The OECD's base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project, commissioned by the G20, has now taken centre stage in global transfer pricing.

With a deadline of September 2014 for initial outputs, following a raft of public consultations, and a final deadline for completion set for September 2015, it's an ambitious project and nothing has yet been decided. But that hasn't stopped taxpayers and their advisers trying to forward plan as to how the final guidelines will impact their businesses and tax structures.

The project has also seen the first serious international discussion about country-by-country reporting, which before the public consultations had begun, was considered a fringe issue and the brainchild of left-wing tax campaigners; rather than something that would ever be accepted by multinational companies.

Tax directors still have a number of concerns about how country-by-country reporting will be adopted by tax authorities around the world, not least because they fear it will provide competitors with sensitive information that will put them at an economic disadvantage.

The OECD needs to iron out the grey areas of country-by-country reporting to ensure that all the information that taxpayers submit to revenue authorities will be crucial and, most importantly, understood and used by revenue officials.

BEPS is, therefore, a big theme in this year's Transfer Pricing supplement with articles looking at what it means for multinational companies, substance and transparency in the context of BEPS and a specific look at how it will impact certain jurisdictions, such as the UK and Germany.

The publication also features an article from Vineet Rachh, a multinational taxpayer, who focusses on the external changes that can impact a company's supply chain and how to manage these issues to promote efficiency in the tax department.

Readers will also benefit from advice about how to choose between the price-setting approach versus the outcome testing approach in Germany, from advisers at PwC; new developments in the Brazilian transfer pricing rules, in an article written by Felsberg Advogados; the Chilean tax reform, by PwC; documentation requirements in France, by LexCase Societe d'Avocats; compliance and reporting outsourcing in Russia, by EY; and US transfer pricing developments from Fenwick & West.

Sophie Ashley

Managing editor

TPWeek.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

From Instagram content to £100m transactions, the founder of Thomas & Co International discusses building a modern tax and accounting firm for business founders
Growing GAAR scrutiny is driving taxpayers to look beyond legal form and demonstrate the commercial rationale underpinning tax-efficient structures
Pillar two has been clients’ ‘biggest headache’ but also a driver of growth for MHA, which believes it has the edge over its big four rivals
Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
Gift this article