Mexico: New miscellaneous rules allow the deduction of pro-rata expenses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Mexico: New miscellaneous rules allow the deduction of pro-rata expenses

cuellar.jpg

David Cuellar

Historically the Mexican Income Tax Law (MITL) has disallowed the deduction of allocated expenses paid abroad when charged on a pro-rated basis. The deduction of pro-rated expenses, conditioned to comply with certain requirements, has only been allowed for Mexican branches or permanent establishments registered in Mexico. During the past summer the Mexican Supreme Court took a step forward in favour of the taxpayers. The outcome of the case in question concludes that for the pro-rata expense to be deductible, there should be a reasonable relation between the expense and the benefit obtained by the Mexican tax resident, the payer of the service.

Further to the court precedent, the Mexican tax authorities (SAT) recently published in the Official Gazette the Fifth set of Miscellaneous Tax Rules for the 2014 Fiscal Year (these rules are issued directly by the SAT without a legislative process, and they are aimed at clarifying the interpretation of the MITL and other Tax Acts or to provide benefits to taxpayers), and included a rule that clarifies that taxpayers may be entitled to claim the aforementioned expense's deduction provided that all the requirements set forth therein are met. Some of the most relevant requirements are as follows:

  • The expense must be strictly indispensable for the taxpayer's activity and must be effectively rendered;

  • Evidence must be gathered to prove the transaction is authentic;

  • The recipient of the payment must be a tax resident of a country with a comprehensive Tax Information Exchange Agreement (TIEA) in force with Mexico;

  • Proof must be provided that it was agreed as an arm's-length transaction at a fair market value, in compliance with Mexican transfer pricing rules;

  • Proof must be provided of the reasonableness of the relation between the expense incurred and the benefit obtained by the taxpayer;

  • The taxpayer must obtain and keep the relevant agreement that must include the rationale supporting the determination of the consideration, as well as the benefits that the services will provide and granting the right to obtain any relevant information regarding the services being charged.

With this rule, effective the day after publication, the Mexican authorities have adjusted their criteria regarding the deductibility of pro-rata expenses. For multinational companies to apply this rule and enable the deduction for the Mexican payer, they should take into consideration all the requirements mentioned in this rule as well as any other requirements established in the Mexican tax legislation set for expenses deductibility and payments abroad.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Juan Jose Chavez (juan.jose.chavez@mx.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Gift this article