Reporting requirements increase compliance burden for Mexican taxpayers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Reporting requirements increase compliance burden for Mexican taxpayers

flag-of-mexico-100x90.png

The Mexican tax authorities have just added to the compliance burden of taxpayers by setting out new information reporting requirements relating to topics such as the financing of derivatives transactions, transfer pricing, restructurings and reorganisations.

The Servicio de Administración Tributaria (SAT) has been one of the most vocal revenue agencies in the world about the dangers of aggressive tax avoidance and the release of Form 76 (in Spanish) only confirms that image.

The compliance demand was issued to conform with the Tax Reform Act of 2014, which added Article 31-A to the Federal Fiscal Code. The law requires reporting of relevant transactions to be made within 30 days of the transaction.

For matters in 2014, the form, which must be filed electronically, must be in by January 31 2015. Other jurisdictions, such as the UK, have had disclosure regimes in place for sometime.

Relevant transactions come under five headings: the financing of derivative transactions; transfer pricing; changes in capital structure, and direct and indirect tax residency; restructurings and reorganisations; and other relevant information, such as that relating to sales of intangible and financial assets, and the transfer of goods through mergers or demergers.

The transfer pricing matters that must be reported cover adjustments if they modify more than 20% of the original value of the transaction, or an intercompany transaction of more than MXP$5 million. Royalties transactions using profit-split methods must also be reported.

“Mexican taxpayers must now disclose certain relevant transactions on a regular basis, and report whether these transactions were carried out with a related party or a third party, and whether those parties are entities residing in Mexico or abroad,” wrote PwC in an alert to clients. “This new filing requirement is a further example of the Mexican government’s continued focus on and scrutiny of intercompany transactions.”

Read this exclusive interview with Gloria Suarez, of the SAT, who explains what information the tax authorities are looking for and what the penalties will be if taxpayers fail to provide it.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent changes in UK tax rules and cross-border requirements are generating high demand for specialist advice, according to MHA
Hany Elnaggar examines how Gulf Cooperation Council countries are internalising transfer pricing norms within evolving fiscal systems shaped by both Islamic and international influences
Where a TP study of comparables produces an arm’s-length range, and the taxpayer’s filed position is outside that range, HMRC will adjust to the median by default
EY, KPMG, Deloitte, and PwC have all seen a decrease in public sector contracts since the scandal – it is understood
Consoli, a tax partner at Brazilian law firm Martinelli Advogados, tells ITR about the importance of staying at the coalface and constantly learning
Despite legislative gridlock, international investors should be wary of legal precedents set by recent court rulings, which could substantially alter the Spanish tax environment
The new outfit, Ashurst Perkins Coie, will bring together around 3,000 lawyers across 23 countries
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we highlight the two Brazilian firms that had a standout year of tier promotions
ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
Gift this article