Norway: Corporate tax changes in the 2015 national Budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Corporate tax changes in the 2015 national Budget

henrik.jpg

Henrik Brødholt

On October 8 2014 the Norwegian government presented the national Budget for 2015. As expected there were no substantial changes regarding corporate income tax, as the government awaits the finalisation of the tax consideration by the Scheel working party. There were, however, changes to partnership taxation and exit taxation, as well as revisions to the R&D credit.

Taxation of partnerships

The national Budget has proposed that partners in Norwegian silent partnerships (IS) and limited partners in limited partnerships (KS) shall be disallowed the ability to use tax losses arising from these partnerships as a means of offsetting taxable profit from other sources. The Budget instead allows for tax losses to be carried forward and offset against future profits, and/or a taxable gain from selling shares, in the same IS or KS. The proposed changes are justified by way of increasing equal treatment of different company types, reducing potential abuse and for general tax rules simplification. The proposed amendments may result in significant changes in the structure, timing and total tax costs for IS and KS companies. These rules are proposed to take effect from 2015.

Exit taxation

According to the existing exit tax rules, assets that are migrated out of Norway are taxable for gains exceeding certain thresholds. This applies only when there has been no change in ownership of the assets. With respect to assets transferred to a taxpayer resident in an EEA country, the payment of the tax assessed may be deferred indefinitely in certain cases. The deferral is subject to an interest charge and security must be provided. However, intangibles and current items are taxable upon exit.

According to the Budget, the deferral rules will now be changed so that any gains will be deferred over seven years calculated on a linear basis (for a gain of 70, 10 will have to be paid in each of the following seven years). This will now also apply for gains from intangibles and current items. The rules are proposed to take effect from 2014.

R&D incentive scheme

The maximum deduction of R&D expenses related to self-development will be revised from NOK 5.5 million ($750,000) to NOK 8 million per firm in 2014, and from NOK 8 to NOK 15 million in 2015. Moreover, the maximum deduction relating to procurement from approved research institutions will be revised up from NOK 11 to NOK 22 million per firm in 2014, and from NOK 22 to NOK 33 million in 2015.

Henrik Brødholt (hbrodholt@deloitte.no)

Deloitte

Tel: +47 984 24 332

Website: www.deloitte.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
Gift this article