Switzerland: Use of a Swiss company’s tax losses after a change of tax status

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Use of a Swiss company’s tax losses after a change of tax status

poltera.jpg

schwarz.jpg

Flurin Poltera


Gabriela Schwarz

Holding companies in Switzerland are, under certain conditions, exempt from cantonal/communal income taxation. Consequently, their income is only subject to taxation on a federal level. If such a company generates losses, for example as a result of valuation allowances on investments and loan receivables, or because of interest expenses, the question arises whether such losses can be used in a tax effective manner if the holding status no longer applies and the company is subject to ordinary taxation. There are various reasons for a change in tax status: the requirements for the tax status may no longer be fulfilled, a tax privileged company might merge with an operating company or a company might voluntarily waive its tax privilege. Based on a federal court decision, there are two options for the cantons how they can treat tax losses generated before the change of the tax status:

  • Some cantons allow for a taxpayer to disclose, before changing its tax status, the hidden reserves generated under the holding regime in a tax neutral manner. In such a case, both losses and re-valuation gains are treated in the same manner, as they are both disregarded for income tax purposes. In cantons which apply this practice, the tax authorities are entitled not to consider tax losses generated before the change of tax status.

  • Cantons which do not foresee such tax neutral step-up should accept the tax losses carried forward which were generated under the privileged tax regime.

The same should also apply with regard to companies benefiting from other tax privileges (for example mixed companies) if they become subject to ordinary taxation.

In any case, the company must claim the beneficial treatment, it will not automatically be granted by the tax authorities. It is therefore important for Swiss taxpayers to take the necessary steps to ensure no tax attributes are lost in the course of a change of the tax status. To get advance comfort in such situations, a ruling request can be filed, upon which the Swiss tax authorities typically confirm the consequences of a change in tax status, including the step up or the availability of tax losses, respectively.

Flurin Poltera (fpoltera@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 7217

Gabriela Schwarz (gschwarz@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 7367

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article