Romania: Participation exemption regime applicable

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Participation exemption regime applicable

parfenie.jpg

Arcadie Parfenie

There are many business driven arguments and motives to set up a holding company within a group. Ideally the holding company would not tax dividend income or capital gains, would not apply withholding tax on dividends payments, interest or royalty outflows or it would provide easy access to the EC Directives and/or strong network of double tax treaties, thereby eliminating or reducing withholding taxes on dividend, interest and royalty flows. Also, the location of the holding company should be sound in standing in the international business community, politically and economically stable, tried and tested as a holding company location. Although Romania was not included among these jurisdictions and it is difficult to pretend such status, it should be noted that a big step ahead was made recently in Romania. At the end of last year, a provision was enacted in the Romanian Fiscal Code which stipulates the exemption for capital gains realised from disposal of shares held either in Romanian entities or legal entities located in treaty countries and exemption of dividend income received from legal entities located in treaty countries. Typically, in most cases, primary holding company involves combining holding activity with financing and treasury activity, and/or IP activities. At this stage, there is no preferential tax treatment with respect to financing and IP holding activities in Romania, however, it should be considered that the new legislative provision would most likely boost the image and attractiveness of Romania as jurisdiction for establishing a holding company. Also, one can note that the requirements for exempting the capital gains are quite light compared with other jurisdictions well known as holding locations.

In particular, dividends received from foreign legal entities subject to corporate income tax or a similar tax, located in third countries with which Romania has concluded a double tax treaty and capital gains derived by Romanian legal entities from the sale of shares in Romanian legal entities or in legal entities from third countries with which Romania has concluded a double tax treaty are tax exempt in Romania under certain conditions. Basically, these provisions would apply if the taxpayer holds, for an uninterrupted period of at least one year, at least 10% of the share capital of (i) the legal entity paying the dividends or (ii) the legal entity in which the shares sold/assigned are held.

Separately, at this moment, Romania is one of few countries which still have an old type of double tax treaty with the US, that is without a limitation of benefits clause. Taking this into account, the treaty benefits may be secured in an easier manner for a reduction of withholding tax on interest payments from the US and further to the enactment of the new provision, for US exemption on capital gains for sale of shares, as well.

Arcadie Parfenie (arcadie.parfenie@ro.ey.com)

EY Romania

Tel: +4021 402 4000

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
Gift this article