FYR Macedonia: FYR Macedonia introduces reverse charge mechanism for select categories of services
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FYR Macedonia: FYR Macedonia introduces reverse charge mechanism for select categories of services

kostovska.jpg

Elena Kostovska

A decision defining the categories of supply of goods and services for which the VAT responsible taxpayer is considered to be the entity to which the supply is being provided by another VAT-registered company was published in the Official Gazette 45/2014 and is applicable as of March 5 2014. The decision lists goods and services on which a reverse charge VAT mechanism is applied as of the aforementioned date and onwards. It also defines the appropriate steps that the involved parties need to follow in such transactions. Namely, the provider of the affected goods/services must indicate that "the VAT liability is transferred to the recipient of the goods/services according to Article 32, point 1 of the VAT Law" on the invoices issued. The provider will neither calculate VAT on the outgoing invoice, nor consider such outgoing VAT in their VAT return. The recipient of the goods/service, on the other hand, will now be obliged to calculate and pay the VAT to the Tax Office while also using their right for deduction of such input VAT.

The published list of goods and services is comprehensive and detailed, and includes, among others, the provision of services related to:

  • Construction, including maintenance, restoration and removal of buildings or parts thereof;

  • Construction of residential and non-residential buildings;

  • Construction of roads and highways;

  • Construction of railways and underground railways;

  • Construction of bridges and tunnels;

  • Construction of utility facilities for liquid storage;

  • Construction of power lines and telecommunications;

  • Construction of hydro facilities;

  • Demolition or wrecking of buildings and other facilities;

  • Preparatory works on a construction site;

  • Electrical installation work;

  • Plumbing, sewage and gas installations and heating and installation of air-conditioning devices;

  • Plastering, carpentry, flooring and paving;

  • Painting and glazing;

  • Used materials and repurposed materials, waste, industrial and non-industrial waste materials; and

  • Property in the process of forced collection by public bidding (including agricultural land, forests and pastures, buildings – residential or commercial)

It is worth noting that the reverse charge mechanism is only applicable when both the service provider and the service recipient are VAT-registered taxpayers.

Elena Kostovska (elena.kostovska@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Skopje Office

Tel: +389 2 2400225

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article