Irish Finance Bill: Country-by-country reporting

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Irish Finance Bill: Country-by-country reporting

The Irish Finance Bill published on October 22 2015 contains details of Ireland's response to Action 13 of BEPS - the minimum standard of country-by-country reporting (CbCR).

While Action 13 is described as a "re-examination of transfer pricing documentation", CbCR could enable countries with relatively high tax rates to target multinationals with taxable profits in countries with effectively low or no tax applying to profits by amending their tax laws to target perceived avoidance. This, however, could be against the underlying agreed principles of BEPS. For groups inverted under an Irish tax resident parent or existing as Irish parented groups, the proposed legislation will shift the compliance burden up a gear. The key point to note is that the Irish Revenue exchange of information obtained through CbCR appears to be without taxpayer's consent, or indeed notification. Failure to comply could attract penalties under Irish tax law and under the Irish Companies Act 2014.

The draft legislation takes effect for fiscal years commencing on or after January 1 2016 and will apply where the ultimate parent is tax resident in Ireland whose consolidated group turnover is more than €750 million ($822 million). Hence, Irish parented groups with a December 31 year end will have less than three months to prepare for the new regime. Country-by-Country reporting will need to be reported for the year ended December 31 2016 by 31 December 2017.

The information to be filed with Irish Revenue is consistent and follows the OECD's CbCR template. The parent company will need to disclose information in tabular form as set out in Annex III of Action 13. For ease of reference, the tables are set out below.

Table 1. Overview of allocation of income, taxes and business activities by tax jurisdiction

table1-570 Click on table to enlarge

Table 2. List of all the Constituent Entities of the MNE group included in each aggregation per tax jurisdiction

table2-570

Click on table to enlarge

The Irish draft legislation also provides for regulations to be prepared by the Irish Revenue to cover:

  • making provision for an Irish resident "surrogate parent" entity to provide a CbC report to the Irish Revenue (broadly this applies where the ultimate parent jurisdiction laws or agreement with Ireland does not oblige the ultimate parent to file a CbC report);

  • notifying the Irish Revenue of CbC reports filed with certain overseas tax authorities;

  • making provision as to how information contained in a CbC report is to be used; and

  • making provision for preserving the confidentiality of the information contained in a CbC report.

The draft legislation gives authority to the Irish Revenue to share CbC reports with other tax or governmental authorities, provided that jurisdiction and Ireland have entered into a qualifying agreement on the exchange of information. Given that Ireland has 72 double taxation agreement partners and a further 25 tax information exchange partners, this gives Irish Revenue considerable reach. There is no provision to notify the Irish parent of the proposed sharing of information or give an appeal against such sharing. It is hoped regulation may deal with this area.

A failure to make a return which would include the filing of an incorrect or incomplete return can result in a penalty of €19,045 plus €2,535 for each day on which the failure continues. Under Companies Act 2014, the directors of Irish incorporated companies are required to confirm the company's tax affairs are in compliance with Irish tax law. Clearly, if there is inadequate CbC reporting, there could be Companies Act penalties too.

As the regime commences with effect from January 1 2016, multinationals with their ultimate parent (or their surrogate parent entity as the case may be) resident in Ireland will need to consider the need to provide detailed information to the Irish Revenue authorities regarding the location and nature of activities of the various group members. This invariably will lead to groups having to consider group reorganisations and rationalisations in advance of filing of their first CbCR. In implementing the compliance regime for CbCR, boards should consider the benefit of independent legal advice that under Companies Act 2014, their systems and arrangements are designed to secure material compliance with the company's obligations.

For further information, please contact:

Gulliver-John
Henson-Robert
Dineen-Maura

John Gulliver
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 5007
jgulliver@mhc.ie

Robert Henson
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 2314
rhenson@mhc.ie

Maura Dineen
Tax Partner
+353 1 614 2444
mdineen@mhc.ie



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two is certain to be a game-changer for tax advisers and their clients. Russell Gammon of Tax Systems outlines 10 reasons why
Despite a general decline in corporate tax rates around the world, jurisdictions are now more reliant on it than in 1990, a Tax Foundation economist found
Australian law firm Webb Henderson’s report said PwC had met 46 of 47 targets; in other news, the OECD has issued new transfer pricing country profiles
The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
Gift this article