Brazil: Changes concerning the capital gains tax rates for non-residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Changes concerning the capital gains tax rates for non-residents

Chin-Michela-100
Conomy-Mark-100

Michela Chin

Mark Conomy

Provisional measure 692/2015 (PM 692) was released by the executive branch of the Brazilian government on September 22 2015. Among other items, PM 692 amends the tax rates applicable to individuals and certain companies on the capital gain deriving from the sale of assets and rights of any nature.

In principle, non-resident companies are subject to the rules applicable for individuals when calculating their Brazilian capital gains tax liability under the current law. Therefore, although PM 692 is, in substance, addressed toward individuals in Brazil, the implications extend to non-resident companies.

Broadly, the previous rules provided that such capital gains should be subject to tax at the rate of 15%. Pursuant to PM 692, the rates should apply as follows:

  • 15% in relation to the portion of gains that do not surpass BRL 1 million ($260,000);

  • 20% in relation to the portion of gains that exceed BRL 1 million and do not surpass BRL 5 million;

  • 25% in relation to the portion of gains that exceed BRL 5 million and do not surpass BRL 20 million; and

  • 30% in relation to the portion of gains that surpass BRL 20 million.

In the event of alienation of a part of the same asset or right as from the second transaction/operation, the capital gain should be calculated with capital gains from previous transactions in order to determine the relevant tax, deducting the amount of tax paid on the previous transaction(s).

Furthermore, pursuant to PM 692, capital gains derived by a company, arising on the alienation of non-current assets or rights, should also be subject to the above rates – except for companies which apply the actual, presumed or arbitrary profit methods (being the key methods of calculating tax for Brazilian entities).

PM 692 enters into effect on the date of publication, however the rates outlined above for capital gains taxation would only take effect from January 1 2016.

Finally, there have already been several issues identified with the current text, such as how the rules should apply to non-residents located in 'tax havens' (subject to withholding tax at 25%), with further issues likely to be raised as the measure is analysed in greater detail.

Michela Chin (michela.chin@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article