Brazil: Changes to the calculation basis and withholding tax for interest on net equity payments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Changes to the calculation basis and withholding tax for interest on net equity payments

Chin-Michela-100
Conomy-Mark-100

Michela Chin

Mark Conomy

On September 30 2015, the executive branch of the Brazilian Government released Provisional Measure 694/2015 (PM 694). Among other items, PM 694 amends the relevant legislation concerning the withholding tax applicable to payments of interest on net equity (INE) as well as introducing a further limitation in relation to the calculation base for such payments.

By way of background, INE is an alternative way of remunerating shareholders for investments made in Brazilian companies, calculated based on their net equity. INE is conditioned to the existence of profits and deductible up to an amount limited to the greater of:

  • 50% of net income before corporate income tax (and after social contribution on net income) for the current year; or

  • 50% of retained earnings and profit reserves.

Such payments of INE are determined based on the pro-rated calculation of the company's net equity accounts (with certain adjustments) multiplied by the long-term interest rate (TJLP). Before the introduction of PM 694, INE payments have generally been subject to a 15% rate of withholding tax, unless the recipients are located in a tax haven, in which case the withholding tax rate should generally be 25%.

Pursuant to PM 694, the calculation basis for INE payments should consider a pro-rated calculation of the company's net equity accounts multiplied by TJLP or 5% per year, whichever is lower. This limitation is potentially significant given the TJLP for September 2015 was 6.5% (increasing to 7% for October 2015 to December 2015). Further, the PM also increases the withholding tax rate to 18% (previously 15%). For foreign shareholders that cannot take advantage of the credit for the withholding tax, this increase could result in a further tax leakage. Treaty benefits should be considered.

It is important to emphasise that a provisional measure is a provisionary law, issued by the executive branch of the Brazilian Government, which has authority of law until it is acted upon by the Brazilian Congress within a prescribed 60-day period. If Congress does not act within this initial period, then it expires unless it is extended for an additional 60-days.

PM 694 entered into effect on the date of publication, however the changes outlined above should only take effect from January 1 2016.

It is important to note that amendments to provisional measures during the process of conversion into law are very common, therefore it will be important to monitor the developments of PM 694 during the conversion process.

Michela Chin (michela.chin@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)
PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Corporate counsel should combine deep technical knowledge with strategic dynamism, says Agarwal, winner of ITR’s EMEA In-house Indirect Tax Leader of the Year award
Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Gift this article