Germany: Discussion draft issued on reform of investment taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Discussion draft issued on reform of investment taxation

wenzel.jpg

vana.jpg

Alexander Wenzel


Thomas Vana

A discussion draft for a reform of Germany's Investment Tax Act published by the Ministry of Finance on July 22 2015 contains fundamental and wide-reaching changes to the taxation of income received by German investors through investment funds. The changes would follow the recent changes effective from December 24 2014. After the release of the discussion draft, a formal legislation procedure might be initiated later in 2015, up until September. If adopted, the new rules would apply as from 1 January 2018.

Under the current tax system, German investors in an investment fund are taxed under the 'tax transparency' principle, that is, profits and income earned by the fund are taxable only in the hands of the investors; the fund is not subject to tax.

The transparent tax system generally would continue to apply to investment funds that do not have more than 100 (non-individual) investors. However, significant changes would be made to the tax treatment of other investment funds and their German investors:

  • The scope of application of the Investment Tax Act would be broadened to capture a number of investment vehicles (except, for example, for typical private equity funds);

  • Taxation would apply at the fund level regardless of where the fund is tax resident.

Investment funds would be subject to the 15% corporate income tax (including the 5.5% solidarity surcharge) on income that is subject to non-resident taxation in Germany, that is, German dividends (including compensation payments), income from real estate assets located in Germany and other income. A tax exemption would be possible only to the extent eligible persons invest in the fund.

At the level of the German investor, the discussion draft provides for taxation of any (1) distributions; (2) lump sum amounts if distributions and appreciation in fund value do not exceed a threshold based on a deemed interest-free rate of return; and (3) capital gains from the disposal of fund units.

To (partially) compensate for the taxation at the fund level, there would be tax relief at the investor level for equity and real estate funds, although stringent requirements would have to be met.

Alexander Wenzel (alwenzel@deloitte.de) andThomas Vana (tvana@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 69 75695 6111 and +49 89 29036 8891

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
Gift this article