Higher tax burden on M&A transactions in Brazil

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Higher tax burden on M&A transactions in Brazil

As Brazil endures economic and political instability, the valuation of businesses for M&A purposes is suffering.

The Government also wants to raise additional funds to give it greater room for budgetary manoeuvre and this has prompted the introduction of new rules to increase taxes and reduce tax benefits, making the situation even worse.

Among all of the new provisions, one in particular may directly affect the net proceeds for sellers in M&A transactions. Provisional Measure No. 692 (PM 692), released September 22 2015, increased the tax burden for capital gains realised by Brazilian resident individuals upon disposal of assets.

Additionally, although PM 692 does not specifically mention capital gains assessed by foreign investors, it may also apply to these in certain circumstances, because Brazilian law determines that the capital gains of foreign investors generally follow the tax rules of individuals resident in Brazil.

Thus, based on the PM, capital gains will generally be subject to income tax (IT) at progressive rates, instead of the existing flat rate of 15%:

-      15% on the portion of gains up to 1 million Brazilian reais ($260,000);

-      20% on the portion of gains exceeding R$1 million and lower than R$5 million;

-      25% on the portion of gains exceeding R$5 million and lower than R$20million; and

-      30% on the portion of gains over R$20 million.

In principle, gains on sales made during 2015 remain subject to 15% tax, whereas sales carried out from 2016 onwards will follow the new progressive rates. However, as PM 692 still needs to be approved by the National Congress (within 120 days) and converted into law by the President before it becomes permanent, there is still some uncertainty as to what the scenario will be in 2016.



It should be noted that PM 692 only changes the general capital gains rules, and does not modify specific provisions and exemptions granted, for example:



(i) 15% for net gains assessed on transactions carried out by individuals on stock exchange; or

(ii) exemption generally granted to foreign investors not located in favourable tax jurisdictions on gains assessed on transactions carried out on stock exchange. Moreover, as investments made by foreign investors through private equity funds (FIP) would remain exempt upon certain requirements, it is advisable to analyse the available structures for each investment acquisition in advance.

In this context, such tax matters are driving the discussions about structures on M&A transactions. While, on the one hand, it might be desirable to conclude a sale in 2015 to have a lower tax burden on the capital gain for the sellers, on the other hand sellers may choose to sell the business in a more attractive national scenario.

Andrea Bazzo Lauletta (+55 11 3147 7761; abazzo@mattosfilho.com) is a partner at Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr e Quiroga Advogados, a principal International Tax Review correspondent firm in Brazil. 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article