Higher tax burden on M&A transactions in Brazil

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Higher tax burden on M&A transactions in Brazil

As Brazil endures economic and political instability, the valuation of businesses for M&A purposes is suffering.

The Government also wants to raise additional funds to give it greater room for budgetary manoeuvre and this has prompted the introduction of new rules to increase taxes and reduce tax benefits, making the situation even worse.

Among all of the new provisions, one in particular may directly affect the net proceeds for sellers in M&A transactions. Provisional Measure No. 692 (PM 692), released September 22 2015, increased the tax burden for capital gains realised by Brazilian resident individuals upon disposal of assets.

Additionally, although PM 692 does not specifically mention capital gains assessed by foreign investors, it may also apply to these in certain circumstances, because Brazilian law determines that the capital gains of foreign investors generally follow the tax rules of individuals resident in Brazil.

Thus, based on the PM, capital gains will generally be subject to income tax (IT) at progressive rates, instead of the existing flat rate of 15%:

-      15% on the portion of gains up to 1 million Brazilian reais ($260,000);

-      20% on the portion of gains exceeding R$1 million and lower than R$5 million;

-      25% on the portion of gains exceeding R$5 million and lower than R$20million; and

-      30% on the portion of gains over R$20 million.

In principle, gains on sales made during 2015 remain subject to 15% tax, whereas sales carried out from 2016 onwards will follow the new progressive rates. However, as PM 692 still needs to be approved by the National Congress (within 120 days) and converted into law by the President before it becomes permanent, there is still some uncertainty as to what the scenario will be in 2016.



It should be noted that PM 692 only changes the general capital gains rules, and does not modify specific provisions and exemptions granted, for example:



(i) 15% for net gains assessed on transactions carried out by individuals on stock exchange; or

(ii) exemption generally granted to foreign investors not located in favourable tax jurisdictions on gains assessed on transactions carried out on stock exchange. Moreover, as investments made by foreign investors through private equity funds (FIP) would remain exempt upon certain requirements, it is advisable to analyse the available structures for each investment acquisition in advance.

In this context, such tax matters are driving the discussions about structures on M&A transactions. While, on the one hand, it might be desirable to conclude a sale in 2015 to have a lower tax burden on the capital gain for the sellers, on the other hand sellers may choose to sell the business in a more attractive national scenario.

Andrea Bazzo Lauletta (+55 11 3147 7761; abazzo@mattosfilho.com) is a partner at Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr e Quiroga Advogados, a principal International Tax Review correspondent firm in Brazil. 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article