Higher tax burden on M&A transactions in Brazil

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Higher tax burden on M&A transactions in Brazil

As Brazil endures economic and political instability, the valuation of businesses for M&A purposes is suffering.

The Government also wants to raise additional funds to give it greater room for budgetary manoeuvre and this has prompted the introduction of new rules to increase taxes and reduce tax benefits, making the situation even worse.

Among all of the new provisions, one in particular may directly affect the net proceeds for sellers in M&A transactions. Provisional Measure No. 692 (PM 692), released September 22 2015, increased the tax burden for capital gains realised by Brazilian resident individuals upon disposal of assets.

Additionally, although PM 692 does not specifically mention capital gains assessed by foreign investors, it may also apply to these in certain circumstances, because Brazilian law determines that the capital gains of foreign investors generally follow the tax rules of individuals resident in Brazil.

Thus, based on the PM, capital gains will generally be subject to income tax (IT) at progressive rates, instead of the existing flat rate of 15%:

-      15% on the portion of gains up to 1 million Brazilian reais ($260,000);

-      20% on the portion of gains exceeding R$1 million and lower than R$5 million;

-      25% on the portion of gains exceeding R$5 million and lower than R$20million; and

-      30% on the portion of gains over R$20 million.

In principle, gains on sales made during 2015 remain subject to 15% tax, whereas sales carried out from 2016 onwards will follow the new progressive rates. However, as PM 692 still needs to be approved by the National Congress (within 120 days) and converted into law by the President before it becomes permanent, there is still some uncertainty as to what the scenario will be in 2016.



It should be noted that PM 692 only changes the general capital gains rules, and does not modify specific provisions and exemptions granted, for example:



(i) 15% for net gains assessed on transactions carried out by individuals on stock exchange; or

(ii) exemption generally granted to foreign investors not located in favourable tax jurisdictions on gains assessed on transactions carried out on stock exchange. Moreover, as investments made by foreign investors through private equity funds (FIP) would remain exempt upon certain requirements, it is advisable to analyse the available structures for each investment acquisition in advance.

In this context, such tax matters are driving the discussions about structures on M&A transactions. While, on the one hand, it might be desirable to conclude a sale in 2015 to have a lower tax burden on the capital gain for the sellers, on the other hand sellers may choose to sell the business in a more attractive national scenario.

Andrea Bazzo Lauletta (+55 11 3147 7761; abazzo@mattosfilho.com) is a partner at Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr e Quiroga Advogados, a principal International Tax Review correspondent firm in Brazil. 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article