Germany: Exemption to Germany’s change-in-ownership rules expanded

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Exemption to Germany’s change-in-ownership rules expanded

Linn-Alexander
Braun-Thorsten

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

The German tax reform 2015, published in the federal gazette on November 5 2015, includes a new exemption from the strict change-in-ownership rules that result in the forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards.

According to the change-in-ownership rules introduced in the 2008 business tax reform, a direct or indirect transfer of more than 25% of the shares of an entity to an acquirer will result in a pro rata forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards; a transfer of more than 50% of the shares will result in a complete forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards.

For transfers after December 31 2009, an exemption for intra-group reorganisations applied in cases where the 'same person' held directly or indirectly a 100% participation in both the transferring and the purchasing entity. However, the exemption did not apply to a share transfer from or to the ultimate parent entity and where the ultimate parent entity was not held by the 'same person', which would be the case, for example, for any stock exchange-listed company.

The tax reform 2015 extends the intra-group exemption rule to apply to changes of shareholders within a 100% controlled group, including the situation where an ultimate parent is the transferring or the purchasing entity and is held by more than one person. Additionally, the ultimate shareholder can be a partnership or an individual; this had been an area of uncertainty and the Federal Ministry of Finance had issued a draft decree that would not allow a partnership or individual to be the ultimate shareholder.

The new rules apply retroactively to share transfers taking place after December 31 2009, thus allowing taxpayers to benefit in cases where tax losses were already forfeited under the previous wording of the law.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article