Switzerland: Amendments to the expatriate ordinance – merely a clarification?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Amendments to the expatriate ordinance – merely a clarification?

melberg.jpg

verheijen.jpg

Per Melberg


Karin Verheijen

Before the start of this millennium, a number of the cantons in Switzerland had their own expatriate ordinance, which was one of the elements used to attract foreign business and talent to their particular canton. In 2000, the federal expatriate ordinance was issued as a part of the tax harmonisation effort between the cantons. The ordinance was widely followed by the cantons but as it was issued as an ordinance, the cantons had room for interpretation. This has led to significant differences in the application of the ordinance. The newly published amendments to the expatriate ordinance, which will come into effect on January 1 2016, clarify a number of the terms used in the former expatriate ordinance, but as the title indicates it is still an ordinance, with room for cantonal interpretation when applied in practice.

What's new?

  • Maximum application of the expatriate ordinance for up to five years – not all cantons have been consistent on this point in the past, so a certain alignment may take place;

  • General lump-sum deduction of CHF 1,500 in lieu of actual costs will only be granted if home country housing is still available to the foreign local hire (FLH) or international assignee (IA) during the stay in Switzerland;

  • Actual housing cost deduction will only be allowed if the FLH or IA permanently and readily has home country housing available. Deductible amount is determined by the cantonal tax authorities;

  • Schooling costs can only be deducted for up to five years. The school sponsoring system is still accepted in lieu of actual schooling costs, however, only for a maximum of five years for the FLH/IA; and

  • Relocation lump-sums or reimbursements (so-called curtain allowance) are no longer deductible. Only direct costs related to the relocation, such as flights and removal costs, may be deducted.

Who can use the expatriate ordinance?

  • Executive employees and specialists with an assignment letter from the home entity to the Swiss entity.

  • Foreign local hires (executive employees and specialists) who are transferred to the Swiss entity may be able to use the new expatriate ordinance. It is a requirement, however, that there is a guarantee of re-employment with the home entity.

The major change in the new expatriate ordinance is that FLHs (executive employees and specialists) who are hired externally to the Swiss entity will no longer be able to use the ordinance. In the past, this was possible in a number of cantons. We also expect the tax authorities to apply a stricter definition of "executive employees and specialists", with the result that the group of employees eligible for benefitting from the ordinance will become more limited.

The amendments to the expatriate ordinance primarily seek to clarify and harmonise the application of the ordinance, which in itself is positive. It may, however, result in an increased tax burden for foreign employees coming into Switzerland in a number of situations.

Per Melberg (pmelberg@deloitte.ch) and Karin Verheijen (kverheijen@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 9018 and +41 58 279 9105

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article