Germany: German Ministry of Finance set to join case on RETT intra-group exception

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: German Ministry of Finance set to join case on RETT intra-group exception

Linn-Alexander
braun.jpg

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) has asked the German Ministry of Finance to join a pending case on the intra-group exception to the German real estate transfer tax (RETT) (case ref. II R 62/14). One of the issues raised by the BFH relates to the question of whether or not the intra-group exception has been notified to the European Commission as potential state aid.

Under the RETT intra-group exception, certain direct or indirect transfers of real estate are exempt from tax. One condition for that exception to apply is that the transaction involves one controlling company and one or more controlled entities, requiring a direct or indirect shareholding of at least 95% to exist for five years before and after the transaction. If interpreted literally, this criterion cannot be met where the transaction involves a merger (where the controlled entity disappears) or a demerger (where the controlled entity is created) because the 95% shareholding would either not survive the transaction or would not exist prior to the transaction. Due to the complexity of the rule and the inconsistency of the current administrative guidance, the BFH has asked the Ministry of Finance to join the case and to provide its view on the rule.

Also worth noting is that the BFH has raised the issue that this intra-group exception might constitute state aid according to article 107 TFEU. The BFH has asked the Ministry of Finance to confirm if the rule has been notified as potential state aid or not. This issue, which has not been discussed in German literature, shows the increased importance of state aid in the area of direct taxation, which extends far beyond the current discussion on ruling practices.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Multinationals importing goods into Brazil may need to align TP files and customs documentation more closely as authorities gain new tools to challenge related-party transactions
Gift this article