Switzerland: Swiss corporate tax reform 2017: Swiss Senate approves revised version of the reform

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss corporate tax reform 2017: Swiss Senate approves revised version of the reform

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

On June 7 2018, the Swiss Senate passed the revised so-called Swiss Corporate Tax Reform 17 Bill following the recommendations of its Ways and Means Committee.

On June 7 2018, the Swiss Senate passed the revised so-called Swiss Corporate Tax Reform 17 Bill following the recommendations of its Ways and Means Committee. The version approved by the Swiss Senate contains the following elements.

Abolishment of all Swiss special income tax regimes

All special Swiss income tax regimes, such as the mixed company or holding company regimes, will be replaced with measures that are both internationally accepted and that ensure Switzerland will remain attractive for multinational companies.

Replacement measures

  • Reduction of the general tax rates at the discretion of the individual cantons, where the majority of cantons will be in the 13% to 14% tax rate range (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal tax rate, effective tax rate [ETR]) with some cantons, such as Zug, Schwyz and Lucerne, with an ETR as low as 12%;

  • Introduction of a patent box, which follows the so-called modified nexus approach by the OECD on a cantonal level with tax relief for qualifying income of up to 90%;

  • Introduction of a research and development (R&D) super-deduction at the cantonal level up to a maximum of 150% of the effective qualifying expenses;

  • Tax-privileged release of reserves for companies transitioning out of tax privileged regimes. This should enable companies to more or less maintain their existing level of taxation for another five years after the sunset of the regimes in 2019 or 2020;

  • Step-up upon migration of a company or of activities and functions to Switzerland. A step-up would be allowed for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes (including on self-created goodwill) for companies or additional activities and functions migrating to Switzerland;

  • Reduction of the cantonal/communal annual capital tax in relation to intercompany loans and patented intellectual property at the discretion of the individual cantons; and

  • Cantons with a 'high' cantonal tax rate may introduce a notional interest deduction (NID) on a cantonal level. This may only benefit the canton of Zurich and potentially very few selective cantons with high enough tax rates.

Revenue raising measures

The Bill contains the following revenue raising measures:

  • Listed companies, when repaying qualified capital contribution reserves (which can be repaid tax free), must now pay at least an equal amount in dividends;

  • The partial taxation of dividends for qualifying Swiss shareholders is increased to 70% at a federal level, respectively to at least 50% at a cantonal level; and

  • The tax reform will be combined with Swiss social security reform, with an increase of social security contributions by employees and employers.

Next steps

The Swiss House of Representatives is expected to vote on the legislation in its autumn 2018 session. The final reform is expected to pass by September 2018.

If there is no referendum, some elements of the tax reform, such as the automatic termination (sunset) of regimes with respective transition measures could become effective as soon as in the first quarter of 2019, with the bulk of the reform being effective as early as January 1 2021.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article