Russia: Russia to ratify the multilateral instrument on BEPS

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Russia to ratify the multilateral instrument on BEPS

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

Russia signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Related Measures to Prevent BEPS (multilateral instrument, or MLI) on June 7 2017.

Russia signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Related Measures to Prevent BEPS (multilateral instrument, or MLI) on June 7 2017.

Russia is now planning to ratify the multilateral instrument, having drafted a ratification law.

Russia has included 71 of the 84 agreements on the avoidance of double taxation (DTAs) listed by the MLI. However, the draft law on ratification does not cover new DTAs such as the Russia-Japan DTA, or DTAs to be concluded such as the Russia-Sweden DTA.

Remarkably, Russia does not intend to include Germany (which is a major EU trading partner), or Switzerland (where many Russian groups have headquarters and trading companies) on its list.

One of the key provisions Russia has chosen to implement is the simplified limitation on benefits (S-LoB) test. This is rarely chosen by countries signing the MLI, most of which prefer the principal purpose test (PPT test). The list of countries using S-LoB is rather short, but includes Greece, Iceland, India, and Kazakhstan, among others.

Even if a treaty partner has not chosen to implement the S-LoB test, there is already a fairly strict domestic beneficial ownership (BO) test in place to check the eligibility of foreign companies to use a treaty to receive Russian-sourced income. The tests overlap, and in certain cases, the BO requirements are far more stringent than those in S-LoB.

Additionally, over the past decade, Russia has consistently changed its DTAs in order to re-allocate taxation rights to capital gains derived from the sale of Russian property-rich companies back to Russia. In line with this, Russia has included this right in its MLI position.

However, only a small number of treaties will be amended (e.g. Italy and Turkey), whereas many others will remain untouched, such as the Russia-Netherlands DTA, despite lots of Russian real estate being held through Dutch holding companies.

These are some of the noteworthy examples regarding Russia's MLI position. There are many more provisions which should be thoroughly reviewed and analysed in light of MLI ratification in Russia.

It is expected that if ratification occurs in 2019, the MLI may take effect from January 1 2020. Therefore, the available time to adapt to structures in the MLI is shrinking, and immediate action may be needed in order to have sufficient time to undertake restructuring where necessary.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK tax authority’s deputy director of large business also reassured taxpayers that HMRC will not ‘nitpick’ returns
Sucafina’s tax chief was speaking at the ITR Pillar 2 Forum in London alongside experts from HMRC and other organisations
India’s Supreme Court rattled cross‑border structuring with its Tiger Global ruling. Subsequent rule changes narrowed the impact, but significant risks around GAAR, substance and treaty access persist
The UK-based big four spin-off firm has hired Marc Lien, who declared that most AI in professional services today is ‘cosmetic’
Projected revenue losses and exemption requests are harming the project’s capability and viability
HMRC secured lengthy prison sentences in a major payroll VAT fraud case, while law firms announced tax promotions and hires
Significant changes include an update to profit markers and an alteration to how an ‘inbound distributor’ is defined
ITR sat down for a pre-event interview with Tim Zech, WTS Germany, and Jeff Soar, WTS UK, keynote speaker at next week’s ITR AI in Tax Forum 2026 in London
Brazil’s bid to seek US-style exemptions from pillar two is ‘highly advantageous’ for multinationals, ITR has also heard
India is signalling flexibility on expat taxation to attract foreign expertise, though employers will need to navigate disclosure, treaty and scope uncertainties
Gift this article