When carbon crosses borders: the European CBAM and regulatory consolidation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

When carbon crosses borders: the European CBAM and regulatory consolidation

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
Emissions from an industrial plant, with a ship in the foreground

Sofia Araújo Alves of Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados explains the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’s transition to its definitive phase, highlighting new compliance requirements, thresholds, and regulatory simplifications

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), established in 2023, aims to correct carbon price differences between imported products and EU-produced products. It encourages cleaner industrial production in non-EU countries by assigning a fair price to the carbon emitted during the production of carbon-intensive goods entering the EU, thus promoting the union’s climate objectives; specifically, climate neutrality.

After a transitional period, the definitive phase of the programme began on January 1 2026, which requires economic operators to comply with a series of measures.

Key aspects of the scheme

The CBAM, as introduced by Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023, applies to imports into the EU of certain goods with significant greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., cement, iron, electricity, steel, and aluminum).

It generally applies to goods originating in a third country when those goods or products processed from those goods are imported into the customs territory of the union, except where provided otherwise in the regulation.

The CBAM is presented as a regulatory-economic mechanism based on the obligation to submit CBAM certificates and to obtain authorised CBAM declarant status as a condition for importing these goods into the customs territory of the EU. However, in practical terms, it closely resembles a carbon tax or a customs duty on selected goods based on the greenhouse gas emissions embodied in the imported goods. CBAM declarants must acquire CBAM certificates from the competent national authorities of their member state of establishment and the price of such certificates is linked to the auction price of EU Emissions Trading System allowances, expressed in euros per tonne of CO₂ emitted.

During the transitional period, economic operators importing the affected goods were only required to report to the national customs authorities information such as the total quantity of each type of good, the total actual embedded emissions, and the carbon price due in the country of origin for the emissions embedded in the imported goods.

This differs greatly from the situation under the definitive period. Now, economic operators will have to comply with a set of important formalities, including the following:

  • An obligation to obtain authorisation and register to participate in the programme;

  • An obligation to submit an annual CBAM declaration including the quantity of goods imported, embedded emissions, and a set of certificates to be surrendered;

  • An annual return of CBAM certificates corresponding to verified embedded emissions;

  • Quarterly maintenance of at least 50% of CBAM certificates relating to embedded emissions in imports since the beginning of the calendar year (starting in 2027); and

  • An update of any changes to the information submitted in the authorisation application in the CBAM register.

Operators are subject to financial penalties in the event of non-compliance. The regulation provides specific mechanisms to combat evasion practices, such as modifying products and their essential characteristics or splitting consignments to avoid the legal threshold.

Simplification of the legal framework

Approximately three months before the definitive period took effect, Regulation (EU) 2025/2083 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 October 2025, amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956, was adopted with the aim of softening the regime.

Of particular note is the exemption based on cumulative net mass. Importers whose total annual volume of covered goods does not exceed 50 tonnes are exempt from CBAM obligations, excluding electricity and hydrogen (importers in these sectors are subject to CBAM obligations from their first import).

Therefore, importers that expect to exceed the annual threshold of 50 tonnes of CBAM goods must apply in advance for authorised CBAM declarant status. Also, when CBAM obligations are assumed by an indirect customs representative, the representative must obtain the status prior to importation.

It is also noteworthy that if customs authorities determine that an importer has exceeded the single threshold based on mass, either through their own knowledge or information from the relevant authorities, they will not allow that importer to import any more goods until the end of the calendar year in question or until they have obtained authorised CBAM declarant status.

Another note regarding simplification is that an authorised CBAM declarant may also delegate the submission of CBAM declarations to a person acting on its behalf and in its name, thus facilitating compliance with its obligations.

Key takeaways

After more than a year of experience with the transitional regime, the legislator has made an effort to facilitate the position of small importers and streamline procedures without neglecting – on the contrary, reinforcing – the monitoring and enforcement powers of the authorities.

Nevertheless, uncertainty remains over how the regime will be implemented in each member state. This could create difficulties for CBAM declarants trying to comply with the current formalities, as member states have significantly delayed implementing the legal regimes necessary for full compliance. And it should be noted that economic operators that do not comply with the provisions may face import interruptions or blockages and sanctions.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
The big four firm is consolidating 16 entities across the region to create a single 6,000-partner behemoth
Gift this article