Deloitte – Central Europe indirect tax interview

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Deloitte – Central Europe indirect tax interview

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
Adham Hafoudh

Interview with Adham Hafoudh, partner, Tax & Legal, Deloitte Czech Republic

1 What is the most significant change to your region/jurisdiction’s tax legislation or regulations in the past 12 months?

Several European jurisdictions have made progress in their e-invoicing and e-reporting agendas. They have introduced or already implemented new obligations for taxpayers. In most cases, there is a phased approach to the changes, with the ultimate aim to cover a wide scope of transactions under these new mechanisms.

2 What has been the most significant impact of that change?

Organisations have had to adapt their processes, and, most importantly, their systems. The biggest challenge lies in the data identification and collection. The data required for the new invoicing/reporting obligations is often collected from different systems and needs to be consolidated. In the next step, consolidated data needs to be processed into the necessary format (for example, e-invoice or the relevant e-report). Various existing or new tools can support this process, but selecting one and successfully implementing it requires significant time, effort, and resources. An added challenge for multinational organisations is that there is no unified international data set for the various e-invoicing and e-reporting obligations.

3 How do you anticipate that change impacting your work and the market moving forwards?

The pace of change has been significant, and we have been helping clients with understanding and navigating the new obligations. The real challenge lies in how to effectively respond, and this is where clients need the most assistance. The focus must be on data availability and quality. While this has been a critical element of the compliance processes already, the scale and scope of data required increases significantly with every new obligation. This will drive the market needs for years to come and has a strong impact on our agenda as advisers.

4 How has this changed the way you offer tax advice?

We have already made the transition from being ‘just’ advisers to offering multifaceted solutions to particular problems and evolving tax agendas. Through our own development and collaboration with alliance partners, we are able to support along the e-invoicing and e-reporting journey and assist in a wide range of processes that these changes necessitate – from analysing what the changes mean, helping choose the preferred way to address them, undertaking process transformation and implementation of the selected solution, and even operating the relevant processes in the post-transformation phase. We offer a mix of tax advisory and technology services to provide complex support to our clients.

5 What potential other legislative/regulatory changes are on the horizon that you think will have a big impact on your region/jurisdiction?

We expect the current wave of automation of the tax agenda to continue. Leading up to 2030, there will be additional e-invoicing mandates, but we also expect new e-reporting obligations. This is by far the most impactful wave of changes we have seen on the VAT landscape in decades.

6 What are the potential outcomes that might occur if those changes are implemented?

There are several potential direct and indirect outcomes of these changes. Most of the new obligations make transaction data available in a great level of detail and often in real time to the tax authorities. This [could] lead to further changes in reporting (for example, the fate of the traditional tax return as we know it will surely be contemplated) or potentially influence the depth and frequency of tax audits. From a broader perspective, the changes [could] serve as an impulse for organisations to consider the level of automation in their tax and reporting agendas.

7 Do you think that change will have a positive effect on both your practice and the wider regional/jurisdictional market?

Whether the effect will be positive or not is for every stakeholder to assess. Automation-driven efficiency is a step in the right direction, if it can ultimately make the life of taxpayers easier and free them up to focus on other activities besides invoicing and reporting. On the other hand, managing these changes is extremely complex, especially for multinational organisations, and puts additional strain on already stretched teams and budgets. Whether they will then reap the benefits of this investment remains to be seen.

8 Are there any regulatory/legislative changes you believe should be implemented in your region/jurisdiction?

From an international perspective, more harmonisation in specific areas would certainly help multinational organisations manage their tax agendas. While it is clear that national governments would likely want to retain sovereignty over their tax policies, there is potential for greater alignment in various obligations, such as e-reporting requirements.

9 How do you believe those changes would help improve the tax landscape in your market?

More international alignment should decrease the cost and complexity of compliance without necessarily limiting tax authorities’ efforts to collect taxes.

10 What sort of issues surrounding the implementation of AI have you seen, and how will AI implementation likely affect your work?

AI provides an opportunity to accelerate significantly the efforts to automate various processes in the tax agenda. Despite AI’s dynamic development, the adoption of AI tools in the tax space needs to be carefully managed. Precision and accuracy are paramount. So is data security. Therefore, I expect gradual implementation along two parallel paths. One is centred on tax professionals and their adoption of various AI tools to improve their personal productivity. The other is centred on the adoption of AI in existing and future tools and systems in order to broaden and deepen the scale of automation they provide.

11 How would you describe the tax authorities’ approach in your region/jurisdiction?

This still differs quite a bit from country to country. From an adviser’s and a taxpayer’s perspective, the key is the ability of the authorities to communicate, both on an individual level and with the business in general. Our clients strive to be compliant, which is more readily done in a transparent tax environment. Positive changes are happening in this respect, but not at the same pace and not across the board.

Tel: +420 737 210 669

E: ahafoudh@deloittece.com

This document has been prepared solely for the purpose of publishing in the 2026 ITR World Tax guide and may not be used for any other purpose. This document and its contents may not be reproduced, redistributed, or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person in whole or in part without Deloitte’s prior written consent.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (DTTL), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Deloitte provides leading professional services to nearly 90% of the Fortune Global 500® and thousands of private companies. Our people deliver measurable and lasting results that help reinforce public trust in capital markets and enable clients to transform and thrive. Building on its 180-year history, Deloitte spans more than 150 countries and territories. Learn how Deloitte’s approximately 460,000 people worldwide make an impact that matters at www.deloitte.com.

This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.

No representations, warranties or undertakings (express or implied) are given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this communication, and none of DTTL, its member firms, related entities, employees or agents shall be liable or responsible for any loss or damage whatsoever arising directly or indirectly in connection with any person relying on this communication. DTTL and each of its member firms, and their related entities, are legally separate and independent entities.

© 2025. For information, contact Deloitte Global.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article