BEFIT: evaluating the EU’s proposed common tax framework for large companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


BEFIT: evaluating the EU’s proposed common tax framework for large companies

Sponsored by

EY_Logo_Beam_STFWC_Horizontal_Large_RGB_OffBlack_Yellow_EN.gif
Euro sign surrounded by EU stars

Razvan Ungureanu and Teona Braia of EY Romania explain the initiative’s benefits, challenges, and implications for large companies operating across multiple jurisdictions in Europe

The EU’s Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) initiative represents a significant legislative proposal aimed at establishing a unified set of rules for determining the tax base of corporate groups.

The European Commission’s goal is to create a common framework for corporate income taxation across the EU, enabling companies with operations and subsidiaries in multiple countries to enjoy a clearer, more predictable, and less bureaucratic tax environment.

Additionally, BEFIT seeks to combat tax evasion and artificial profit shifting by fostering a more transparent, equitable, and unified system within the European tax market, characterised by simplified regulations.

The main objective: simplifying tax compliance

The core idea behind BEFIT is to simplify the tax compliance process for companies. Under this framework, businesses will be able to calculate and declare their taxes more easily, without the need to navigate the varying tax rules of each EU member state. This simplification is expected to facilitate accurate tax calculations by national authorities and reduce the administrative burden on companies.

The initiative aligns with the international agreement on global minimum taxation negotiated within the OECD/G20, integrated into European law through the EU’s Pillar Two Directive.

Allocation of the tax base and application of BEFIT

One of the most critical aspects of the BEFIT legislative proposal is the allocation of the consolidated tax base among member states. This allocation occurs in two stages:

  • Transitional stage (2028–35) – during this initial period, the total profit of the corporate group will be distributed among its EU entities based on the average tax results achieved by each entity over the previous three tax years. This method aims to ensure a smooth transition without causing significant disruptions to existing tax structures.

  • Subsequent phase (post-2035) – following the transition period, the European Commission may propose a permanent allocation formula that accurately reflects the actual economic activity in each member state. This formula could take into account various factors, including sales volume, workforce metrics (such as wage costs or employee numbers), and the value of tangible assets utilised in business operations.

Application of national tax rates

While BEFIT establishes a common tax base for calculation, it does not harmonise tax rates across member states. Each country will still apply its own corporate tax rate to the portion of the tax base allocated to entities within its jurisdiction.

For instance, if the total tax base is €200 million, distributed according to the applicable allocation key, the tax liabilities would be calculated as follows:

  • Romania (rate: 16%) – 16% × €50 million = €8 million;

  • Germany (rate: 30%) – 30% × €90 million = €27 million; and

  • France (rate: 28%) – 28% × €60 million = €16.8 million.

In total, the tax paid in the EU would amount to approximately €51.8 million. This calculation is based on a single common rule, although jurisdictions may allow for certain local adjustments. The actual taxation will be applied locally, ensuring that double taxation or artificial profit shifting between subsidiaries is avoided.

Potential benefits for businesses

The proposed benefits of BEFIT include:

  • Simplified tax compliance – fewer divergent rules between countries will streamline the compliance process;

  • Reduced administrative costs – companies can expect fewer returns and audits, leading to lower operational costs;

  • Increased transparency – automatic profit allocation will minimise aggressive tax optimisation practices; and

  • Greater predictability – a common tax framework will facilitate long-term planning for businesses.

Potential challenges

However, there are also risks and implications for companies to consider:

  • Possible loss of local tax advantages – companies may lose favourable tax regimes in certain countries;

  • High transition costs – adapting ERP systems, revising business models, and conducting internal recalculations may incur significant expenses;

  • Profit sharing implications – tax increases may occur in countries with higher rates (e.g., Germany), while profits could decrease in those with lower rates (e.g., Romania); and

  • Lack of rate harmonisation – although the tax base is common, significant differences in tax rates between countries (e.g., 9% in Hungary versus 30% in France) remain.

What should companies do?

To effectively prepare for BEFIT, companies should:

  • Analyse their current exposure to national tax regimes;

  • Simulate the application of the allocation formula based on tax results from the previous three years;

  • Collaborate with legal, tax, and IT teams to adapt internal systems accordingly;

  • Prepare staff for new reporting and compliance requirements; and

  • Reassess tax policies and intercompany contracts in light of the new rules.

Final thoughts on the BEFIT proposal

According to the OECD, large groups with a consolidated turnover of at least €750 million contribute approximately €132 billion (about 1% of GDP) in taxes. The new, simpler BEFIT rules could reduce current tax compliance costs by up to 65%.

If adopted, this initiative could fundamentally transform the taxation landscape for companies in the EU, replacing older proposals such as the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base.

The estimated deadline for full implementation is 2030, but the success of BEFIT will hinge on achieving political consensus within the European Parliament and the Council.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Advisers won’t be short of work in a world of increased valuation disputes, documentation requirements and behavioural responses from clients seeking to protect their wealth
Jaydeep Menon explains how Frazier & Deeter built a specialist practice which helps UK start-ups expand into the US and why private equity backing is accelerating its ambitions
As joint audits, data sharing and pillar two reshape tax controversy, multinational groups can no longer afford to manage disputes one jurisdiction at a time
Brazil's tax system is being reshaped by VAT , pillar two and TP reform. Fallet explains why those changes convinced him to lead a new practice
The agreement with Daribatech, alongside recent high-profile investment in talent, suggests the firm is gearing up for a significant push in the region
Several factors have led to a steady transition of TP work away from traditional advisers and towards full-service law firms, DLA Piper’s new TP leader says
Julian Balson's departure from EY's Tier 1 tax controversy practice for lower-ranked Fieldfisher represents one of the more eye-catching UK hires of the year
Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel argues that the biggest obstacle to AI adoption in tax is not technology, but trust, and introduces a practical AI risk framework to help
Howell takes a deep dive into how he led the landmark PepsiCo dispute, discusses the ATO's enforcement priorities, and emphasises KordaMentha's market ambitions
Gift this article