Spanish court confirms primacy of tax treaty provisions over domestic legislation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spanish court confirms primacy of tax treaty provisions over domestic legislation

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-garrigues.png
Scales of justice by a laptop

Rafael Calvo and Adrián Arroyo of Garrigues Madrid discuss a National Court judgment clarifying that interest on equity (JSCP) received from Brazilian entities qualifies for an exemption under the Spain–Brazil double tax treaty

In a judgment dated May 22 2025 – in a case in which Garrigues represented the taxpayer – Spain’s National Court (Audiencia Nacional) declared that interest on equity (juros sobre o capital próprio, or JSCP) received from Brazilian entities qualifies as dividend income for the purposes of the Spain–Brazil double tax treaty (DTT) and is therefore eligible for the exemption method under Article 23.3 of the treaty, regardless of domestic law provisions.

The decision represents a significant development in the interpretation of tax treaties in Spain, reinforcing and further shaping key principles of international tax law – particularly the primacy of treaty provisions over domestic legislation and the importance of their systematic and teleological interpretation.

Background and administrative controversy

JSCP had already been recognised as dividend income following several Supreme Court judgments in 2016, which allowed such payments to benefit from Spain’s previous domestic participation exemption regime. However, as of January 1 2015, the domestic exemption method of Article 21 of the Spanish Corporate Income Tax Law (the CIT Law) was amended to exclude from its scope any dividend distribution that, like JSCP, constitutes a tax-deductible expense for the paying entity.

Despite the changes introduced in the domestic exemption regime, the Spain–Brazil DTT has not been modified and continues to provide for an exemption method without any limitation for dividend payments that can be subject to taxation at source. Given the regulatory divergence between the domestic exemption regime and the broader exemption method under the Spain–Brazil DTT (which is not technically surprising, given their different scope and purpose), the controversy centred on whether the treaty exemption could apply to JSCP, irrespective of the limitation included in domestic law.

In this regulatory context, the Spanish Tax Agency (STA), in the case at hand, denied the applicability of both the domestic and treaty exemption methods to JSCP. The STA’s position was based on prior rulings (V2960-16 and V2962-16) issued by the General Directorate of Taxes (GDT).

While, in line with previous judgments, the STA accepted the characterisation of JSCP as dividends under domestic law – and therefore denied the domestic exemption of Article 21 of the CIT Law, which has been limited since 2015 – it argued that, for treaty purposes, JSCP should be treated as interest due to its tax treatment in Brazil. Accordingly, the STA also denied the application of the exemption method under Article 23.3 of the DTT, which applies only to dividends. Instead, the STA applied Article 23.2 of the DTT, which provides for the credit method applicable to interest – resulting in higher Spanish taxation.

The National Court’s decision: treaty law prevails

The National Court firmly rejected the STA’s approach, holding that treaty provisions, as part of international law, must generally prevail over domestic law. Accordingly, domestic provisions may apply only to the extent that they do not contradict the content or purpose of the treaty.

The National Court further held that:

  • The Spain–Brazil DTT clearly classifies JSCP as dividends rather than interest;

  • Rulings by the GDT do not constitute a source of law and cannot override the provisions of a treaty; and

  • Domestic rules under the Spanish CIT Law are not applicable when they conflict with the purpose of the treaty.

In line with the above, the National Court concluded that JSCP may benefit from the exemption provided under Article 23.3 of the Spain–Brazil Double Tax Treaty, as argued by the taxpayer.

Practical implications

This judgment not only provides valuable legal certainty for Spanish multinationals with operations in Brazil – confirming that JSCP qualifies for exemption in Spain under the Spain–Brazil DTT, regardless of the more limited scope of the Spanish domestic exemption regime – but also reinforces and further defines the fundamental principle of the primacy of tax treaty law.

Indeed, the judgment confirms that the primacy of tax treaty law cannot be overridden by introducing limitations in domestic legislation that are not provided for in the treaty itself. By doing so, it helps to define the boundaries of domestic law in relation to treaty law, and its reasoning could serve as a reference for other taxpayers seeking to apply the provisions of Spain’s tax treaties, despite limitations or legislative changes introduced into Spanish domestic legislation.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article