Sweden proposes reduction of SINK rate in move towards greater tax neutrality

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sweden proposes reduction of SINK rate in move towards greater tax neutrality

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
Swedish flag against sunset.jpg

Victoria Robinson of KPMG Sweden examines the government’s proposal to reduce the rate of special income tax for non-residents to 20% from January 2026 as it strives to enhance tax neutrality and global competitiveness

In a memorandum dated May 19 2025, the Swedish government has proposed a legislative amendment to reduce the special income tax for non-residents (särskild inkomstskatt för utomlands bosatta, or SINK) from 25% to 20%, effective from January 1 2026. The proposed change would apply to income received on or after January 1 2026 and is expected to affect approximately 90,000 individuals currently subject to SINK taxation.

Overview of SINK and the legislative context

The SINK regime, governed by the Special Income Tax Act for Non-Residents (1991:586), provides a simplified taxation mechanism for individuals with limited tax liability in Sweden. Under this regime, non-resident individuals earning Swedish-sourced income such as employment income, pensions, and certain other remunerations may submit an application to be taxed at a flat rate, currently 25%, without the obligation to file a Swedish tax return. The tax is final, and no deductions for expenses are permitted.

The current rate has remained unchanged since 2018, despite broader reductions to other income tax rates. The government’s rationale for the proposed reduction is to restore tax neutrality, particularly in light of these recent reforms that have lowered the income tax burden for individuals subject to the regime for individuals who fall under the category of unlimited tax liability.

Policy objectives and fiscal impact

The Ministry of Finance anticipates that the proposed reduction will result in an annual revenue loss of approximately SEK700 million. However, this is viewed as a necessary adjustment to maintain the integrity and fairness of the Swedish tax system. The measure is also expected to enhance Sweden’s attractiveness to international talent and cross-border workers, particularly in sectors where short-term assignments and remote work arrangements are prevalent.

From a policy perspective, the proposal aligns with Sweden’s broader objective of ensuring that its tax framework remains competitive and administratively efficient. The SINK regime, by design, reduces compliance burdens for non-residents and facilitates tax collection through withholding at source. A lower rate may further incentivise compliance and reduce the risk of tax avoidance through informal arrangements.

Implications for employers and global mobility professionals

Employers with internationally mobile employees should assess the implications of the proposed rate reduction on their cost projections and payroll systems. While the change is expected to reduce the overall tax burden for affected individuals, it may also necessitate updates to internal policies, assignment cost estimates, and gross-up calculations.

For global mobility professionals, the proposal underscores the importance of proactive tax planning and communication with non-resident assignees. The transitional period leading up to January 1 2026 offers an opportunity to revisit existing SINK applications, evaluate eligibility, and ensure that payroll systems are configured to apply the new rate from the effective date.

Key takeaways on the reduction of the SINK rate

The proposed reduction of the SINK rate to 20% represents a significant policy shift aimed at enhancing tax neutrality and competitiveness. While the fiscal cost is non-trivial, the measure is consistent with Sweden’s commitment to a fair and efficient tax system. Stakeholders, including employers and tax advisers, should monitor the legislative process closely and prepare for implementation in advance of the 2026 effective date.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
Gift this article