Navigating dual-use items regulations: a strategic edge for exporters

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Navigating dual-use items regulations: a strategic edge for exporters

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-vieira.png
Tablet device and shipping port.jpg

Conceição Gamito, Rita Simão Luís, and Nídia Rebelo of VdA reflect on the complexities and strategic importance of understanding and complying with regulations related to dual-use items in international commerce, and explain the Portuguese framework

Dual-use goods are items, materials, software, or technologies that can be used for both civilian and military applications. While these goods have legitimate commercial or industrial uses, they also have the potential to be used in the development, production, or enhancement of military equipment or weapons.

Because of their potential to be used in harmful ways, dual-use goods are subject to strict export controls and regulations to ensure that they are not used for purposes that threaten national or international security.

In the fast-paced world of international commerce, understanding the regulation of dual-use items may present not only a compliance challenge but a strategic business advantage.

Challenges and compliance essentials

As revealed by the European Commission’s report on trade in dual-use items for 2022 to 2024, there has been a notable rise in authorisations and denials for exporting these items in comparison with 2021.

This trend underscores the heightened scrutiny by the EU and its member states, driven by an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape and ongoing global conflicts. These factors necessitate a meticulous evaluation of the security risks associated with exporting sensitive goods.

Exporters of dual-use items encounter numerous challenges in navigating the complex regulatory landscape. Ensuring compliance with the stringent requirements of national and EU regulations, as well as international agreements, is critical and demands an in-depth grasp of several essential components:

  • Classification of dual-use items;

  • Assessment of necessary export authorisations;

  • Intricacies of the licensing process;

  • End-use and end-user certification; and

  • Reporting obligations.

Moreover, companies must also stay abreast of the frequent updates to the control lists and regulations. Failure to do so can lead to inadvertent violations, which carry the risk of severe penalties that could cripple enterprises both financially and reputationally.

The regulatory framework in Portugal

In Portugal, the control measures for dual-use items, as outlined in Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of May 20 2021 (the EU Regulation), have been adopted and implemented through Decree-Law No. 130/2015 of July 9. This law establishes the competent authority for the licensing and control of operations covered by the EU Regulation (the Portuguese Tax and Customs Authority; specifically, the Licensing Services Directorate) and defines the obligation for economic operators to report transactions carried out within a given period. It also specifies the types of export licences required and the infractions and respective sanctions in the case of violations of the obligations imposed by the EU Regulation.

While the legislative framework provides a solid foundation, many practical aspects remain inadequately addressed in publicly available resources, posing challenges for exporters striving for compliance. Common queries among economic operators include:

  • How do I determine if the product I intend to export requires a licence?

  • Is there a go-to entity for confirming accurate product classification?

  • What specific information is needed for the end-use certificate?

  • What are the specificities applicable to intangible transfers, such as software or technology?

  • When and how should periodic transactions be reported?

  • What is their required format and essential content?

  • How is the electronic licence application form completed and submitted, and what supporting documents are necessary?

  • What should be taken into account when developing the internal compliance programme necessary for securing global export licences?

While the EU framework aims for harmonisation, practical implementation varies widely among member states. Differences in documentation, application formats, review timelines, and reporting expectations mean that companies operating in multiple jurisdictions must tailor their compliance programmes to each country’s specific requirements. This lack of uniformity poses additional challenges for companies operating in multiple member states and requires businesses to adapt their internal procedures and compliance programmes to the practices and expectations applicable in each jurisdiction in which they operate, demanding agility and local expertise.

Gaining a strategic advantage through compliance

Navigating the regulatory landscape for dual-use items is a complex but essential task for businesses involved in international trade. By understanding the key areas of compliance, staying updated on regulatory changes, and building strong relationships with regulatory authorities, companies can ensure they meet all the necessary requirements and avoid the severe penalties associated with non-compliance. This proactive approach not only safeguards the business but also contributes to global security and stability.

For businesses looking to thrive in the international market, mastering the intricacies of dual-use item regulations is not just a legal obligation but a strategic advantage. By investing in compliance, companies can protect their interests, enhance their reputation, and help to foster a safer global environment.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
Gift this article