How to optimise VAT in Portuguese property transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How to optimise VAT in Portuguese property transactions

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-vieira.png
Housing development near Funchal, Portugal

Effective VAT management can be achieved through utilising the option to tax on commercial property and the reverse charge mechanism, say Conceição Gamito, Rita Simão Luís, and Nídia Rebelo of Vieira de Almeida & Associados

Property transactions – encompassing the acquisition, disposal, development, or leasing of real estate – are subject to a myriad of complex and diverse VAT rules and rates in Portugal. These rules vary significantly depending on the type, location, and use of the property, as well as the status and intention of the parties involved.

For businesses engaged in property development, investment, or management, understanding and applying the appropriate VAT rules and rates is crucial for optimising VAT costs and recovery, thereby improving cash flow and working capital.

In Portugal, both the lease and transfer of immovable property are, as a rule, always exempt. This creates a need for meticulous planning, analysis, and structuring of transactions, along with regular reviews of the business’s VAT position and performance, to ensure effective VAT management in these transactions.

Strategies for optimising VAT neutrality

Understanding the implications of exempt transactions

In many EU countries, the first supply of a building or part of a building, as well as the supply of land, is subject to VAT. This allows for the real estate developers’ right to recover VAT on construction costs.

In Portugal, all supplies of immovable property – of buildings, including the supply before first occupation, and of land – are exempt from VAT.

Having a VAT-exempt acquisition or disposal of immovable property jeopardises the right to recover VAT on construction costs. Additionally, when VAT on construction has already been recovered (for buildings already in use), a VAT-exempt supply may trigger the need for VAT adjustments, which may add significant unpredicted costs to property transactions.

However, special VAT regimes may mitigate or eliminate the adverse consequences arising from an exempt sale.

Option to tax on commercial property

One effective strategy is considering the option to tax on commercial property, which is available for leases and supplies of land or buildings. In Portugal, this option has increased in popularity due to the growing uncertainty associated with the scope of application of the VAT exemption for the lease of immovable property.

The option for taxation allows businesses to recover VAT on construction costs and related services. However, opting to tax means charging VAT to tenants, which could make the property less attractive to VAT-exempt businesses, so it is essential to consider the tenant’s VAT recovery position when making this decision.

Additionally, the Portuguese option for taxation regime entails a complex and extensive set of rules concerning the property, as well as the parties. Therefore, it is important to align these rules with the envisaged business model from day one, as factors such as the amount of refurbishment costs or rent price may make or break the possibility to opt for taxation.

Reverse charge and VAT deferral

Developers may face cash flow disadvantages if they are required to pay VAT on construction costs upfront and then wait for recovery through their VAT returns. This can strain liquidity, especially for smaller businesses or those with limited cash reserves.

Portugal features a domestic reverse charge mechanism applicable to the purchase of construction works by taxable persons that have the right to input VAT deduction.

Reverse charge does not in any way diminish the amount of VAT paid, but it does mean the payment of VAT and deduction (when allowed) are simultaneous, aiding in cash flow management.

From the supplier’s standpoint, reverse charge means not assessing VAT on invoices and therefore not running the risk of having to advance VAT to the state without having received payment.

On the other side of the scale, though, reverse charge means less assessed VAT for the supplier to offset against deducted VAT. This could leave businesses in a credit position and having to request VAT refunds, delaying the financial effect of the VAT deduction.

Joint ventures and special purpose vehicles

Lastly, businesses can also use joint venture arrangements, holding companies, or special purpose vehicles to share VAT costs and risks with partners or to isolate the VAT impact of property transactions from other business activities. This approach can provide flexibility and mitigate potential VAT liabilities.

Key takeaways on managing VAT in property transactions

VAT management in property transactions is a multifaceted and intricate process that requires careful planning, a deep understanding of local regulations, and strategic structuring of transactions. By considering possibilities such as opting to tax and VAT reverse charge, and understanding the VAT position of all parties involved, businesses can optimise their VAT costs and improve cash flow. However, they must also be vigilant about the potential challenges and risks, including cash flow disadvantages for buyers and compliance obligations.

Ultimately, effective VAT management in property transactions can provide significant financial benefits and enhance the overall efficiency of a business’s operations. By staying informed and proactive, businesses can navigate the complexities of VAT regulations and achieve optimal outcomes in their property transactions.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier for them than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Taylor Wessing, whose most recent UK revenues were £283.7m, would become part of a £1.23bn firm post combination
China and a clutch of EU nations have voiced dissent after Estonia shot down the US side-by-side deal; in other news, HMRC has awarded companies contracts to help close the tax gap
An EY survey of almost 2,000 tax leaders also found that only 49% of respondents feel ‘highly prepared’ to manage an anticipated surge of disputes
Gift this article