Poland: CJEU issues revolutionary ruling on board members’ joint and several liability

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: CJEU issues revolutionary ruling on board members’ joint and several liability

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
EU flag and justice.jpg

Tomasz Michalik and Jakub Warnieło of MDDP consider the ramifications of a Court of Justice of the European Union decision on Poland’s provisions concerning board members’ joint and several liability for tax arrears

A landmark judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 27 2025 has challenged Poland’s model of joint and several liability of management board members for their company’s tax arrears. The ruling (in case C-277/24, Adjak) may have significant implications for corporate governance and tax liability for board members across the EU.

Framework for joint and several liability in Poland

Under Polish law, management board members can be held jointly and severally liable for tax liabilities incurred during their tenure if:

  • Irregularities are identified in the company’s tax settlements;

  • Enforcement against the company’s assets is deemed ineffective; or

  • The management board fails to initiate insolvency proceedings within the statutory time limit.

A major issue with this framework is that board members, in proceedings determining their liability, are precluded from disputing the findings of the tax authorities in prior proceedings against the company. They are also not recognised as a party in such proceedings. The tax decision against the company becomes prejudicial and a member of the management board cannot effectively challenge its content.

The CJEU’s ruling

The CJEU concluded that, in proceedings involving joint and several liability for a company’s tax arrears, a board member must be granted:

  • The right to effectively challenge the findings of the tax authorities in proceedings against the company; and

  • Access to the case files from those proceedings.

This decision underlines the need to ensure that board members have the opportunity to adequately defend themselves – in accordance with the fundamental principles of EU law – when their personal liability is at stake.

Implications for EU member states

The CJEU’s judgment has broader implications beyond Poland, prompting other EU member states to reassess their regulations concerning the personal liability of company board members. The ruling emphasises the paramount importance of procedural fairness and the right to defence, which are core tenets of EU law.

Impact on the situation in Poland

The CJEU judgment is of fundamental significance for the conduct of proceedings concerning joint and several liability of management board members in Poland. The decision may have a direct impact on all completed and pending proceedings.

In response to the CJEU’s ruling, Poland may be required to amend its tax regulations to ensure that management board members are entitled to:

  • Participate as parties in tax proceedings against their companies;

  • Access relevant case files; and

  • Challenge the tax authorities’ findings effectively.

Such reforms would bring Polish law into alignment with EU standards, ensuring that individuals are not unjustly held liable without the opportunity to mount a proper defence.

Key takeaways from the case

The CJEU ruling in the Adjak case is a very important step towards ensuring tax security for board members in the EU. Questioning the Polish provisions on joint and several liability of board members, the court emphasised the importance of procedural fairness and the right to defence.

The ruling may prompt the introduction of legislative reforms in Poland. It may also lead to the introduction of changes to proceedings on joint and several liability of board members in other EU member states.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
All the tax partners elevated across the UK, US and Singapore were private client specialists, continuing a market trend of intense investment and competition
Rolf van de Velde, dubbed ‘an expert chosen by experts’, is tasked with scaling Reptune’s self-service compliance offering
The newly combined firm brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York.
Building a transparent culture, prioritising internal promotions and being different from the big four are all key features of A&M Tax’s ambitious plans for India
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
Gift this article