Brazil’s tax reform journey: a long road, with further challenges ahead

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil’s tax reform journey: a long road, with further challenges ahead

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-vertex-logo.png
Winding road in Brazil

Fernando Silva of Vertex provides a guide to the ambitious transformation of Brazil’s complicated tax landscape, and says careful navigation will be required to negotiate dual VAT and phased implementation

Brazil’s tax system has long been ranked among the most complicated and least efficient in the world. This frustrates citizens, domestic and foreign corporations, investors, and tax authorities alike, with multiple layers of taxation governed by overlapping and often conflicting sets of rules. But now that is changing. After 30 years of innumerous attempts, Brazil’s government is embarking on what is arguably the most ambitious tax transformation in the country’s history. 

The measure, passed in December 2023, sets up a more transparent tax system that simplifies an outdated collection process for the production and sale of goods and the provisioning of services. Removing complexity from tax terms, conditions, and rules alone could significantly improve Brazil’s business environment, increase productivity, and boost investments in the country.

But while Brazil’s tax reform promises long-term clarity, in the near term it will likely bring additional challenges. There will be a phase-in period of between seven and 10 years that will force companies and tax preparers to learn a new set of rules and comply with two different, and sometimes contradictory, systems. 

The new system, described as ‘dual VAT’, replaces five taxes with three. New allocations include a federal non-cumulative tax of goods and services (contribuição sobre bens e serviços, or CBS) and a separate tax on state and municipal goods and services (imposto sobre bens e serviços, or IBS). There is also a third selective tax, which combines elements of an excise tax and so-called sin taxes on products deemed harmful to health or the environment, such as alcohol, tobacco, and cars with inefficient exhaust systems.

Other changes in consumption taxation aim to redirect and redistribute revenue allocations, by reducing sectoral, social, and geographic inequalities. By streamlining tax rules, the aim of the tax reform is to eliminate competitive imbalances where resource-rich states ‘steal’ companies by offering long-term incentives. Taxes will be charged at the customer location, rather than the current model that taxes at the supplier location (origin). Significant IBS reductions for certain goods and services are designed to stoke investments in industry sectors ranging from financial services to theme parks, to regional transportation systems. The new plan also has a provision to create a fund for sustainable development for the states of the western Amazon and Amapá State.

The transition to the new system will take place in stages. 2025 will see back-end processes and new legislation setting the stage for the new era. Then, in 2026, things get interesting. The new CBS and IBS take effect, but existing taxes will stay in place and gradually be phased out, so taxpayers will need to handle two regimes and two sets of rules. From 2029 to 2032, the tax on the circulation of goods and services (imposto sobre circulaçao de mercadorias e serviços, or ICMS) and the municipal service tax (imposto sobre serviços, or ISS) are dropped in stages, before they are formally extinguished in 2033, opening the door for a new system, with new implementations. 

Specific challenges professionals will face

Professionals and systems will need to be updated regularly as changes are implemented. Taxpayers will need to navigate all the challenges that can result from two different tax regimes, separate control of credits, different inspections, and the impacts of the double regime on existing and new case law.

Tax calculations will require adaptations to accommodate new impositions, rates, and rules. But tax calculations are just the beginning of the journey. Tax preparers need to stay current and ensure that returns are produced correctly while rules are changing from year to year. E-invoice amendments must be made to accommodate new fields, and compliance reports must be adjusted.  

The process will need to be reviewed and revised to provide accurate returns to the tax authorities and invoice correctly. Otherwise, companies will face risks, such as fines, penalties, potential audits, and even prosecutions. 

Tax reform in Brazil has been debated for years, dating back to a major initiative conducted in 1995. Three decades later, reform is here. Companies, lawyers, and tax advisers will need to prepare for this paradigm shift. Society is now better prepared and equipped to manage such changes, with technology playing a role in bringing clarity to a tax system that has long been entangled in bureaucracy.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
Gift this article