ATO issues guidance on new thin capitalisation rules and the CCIV regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ATO issues guidance on new thin capitalisation rules and the CCIV regime

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
Arrow and australian banknotes staircase - Money growth concept

Jun Au of DLA Piper Australia summarises the Australian Taxation Office’s newly set out considerations in deciding whether to examine a debt restructure and the key tax rules concerning corporate collective investment vehicles

Restructures in response to new thin capitalisation rules

Broadly, as a result of the new thin capitalisation regime and debt deduction creation rules (DDCR) that were enacted in April 2024, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) issued a Draft Practical Compliance Guideline (Draft PCG 2024/D3) on October 9 2024. Draft PCG 2024/D3 sets out the ATO's compliance approach to reviewing arrangements that have been restructured in response to the DDCR, including for the potential application of the general anti-avoidance rules (Part IVA) and the DDCR specific anti-avoidance rules

The guideline establishes a risk assessment framework that sets out the matters the ATO will take into account in deciding whether to devote compliance resources to further examine a restructure.

  • White zone (further risk assessment not required)the criteria for the white zone, which the ATO does not anticipate many taxpayers will meet, involve having a post-April 8 2024 settlement agreement or court decision covering the Australian tax outcomes under the DDCR, with no subsequent material change in the arrangement.

  • Yellow zone (compliance risk not assessed)the yellow zone applies to restructures (including any part thereof) that do not fall within the green or red zones. The ATO may wish to engage with taxpayers in this category to understand the compliance risks of their restructures.

  • Green zone (low risk) – a taxpayer is in the green zone if the restructure is covered by a low-risk example in Schedule 2 to Draft PCG 2024/D3 and if the arrangements are otherwise commercial and on arm's-length terms, if any debt deductions that are disallowed by the DDCR prior to the restructure are accurately calculated, and if the ATO has provided a low-risk or high-assurance rating.

  • Red zone (high risk) – the ATO will prioritise its resources to review a restructure if it is covered by a high-risk example in Schedule 2 to Draft PCG 2024/D3 or a high-risk or low-assurance rating from the ATO. The ATO "will generally tell" the taxpayer if it intends to commence an examination involving the DDCR anti-avoidance rule or Part IVA.

The PCG provides the following examples of certain restructures:

  • Low-risk restructures – these include repaying the debt interest, disposing of foreign assets, and terminating swaps, provided they meet certain criteria.

  • High-risk restructures – these involve arrangements in which debt deductions are expected to be disallowed and similar deductions are claimed under restructured arrangements. Examples of high-risk arrangements include round-robin financing, change in 'use' of debt under related-party arrangements, and certain contrived arrangements, such as debt 'dumping' into Australia.

Further details on the ATO’s view of risks from restructures will be published as a new Appendix 3 to the guideline.

The Draft PCG 2024/D3 is open for comments until November 8 2024. When finalised, the PCG will apply to restructures entered into on or after June 22 2023.

The CCIV regime

On October 2 2024, the ATO finalised Law Companion Ruling (LCR) 2023/D1 in the form of LCR 2024/1, which explains various key aspects of the taxation of corporate collective investment vehicles (CCIVs). The final LCR sets out the key tax rules that apply to CCIVs, including the following:

  • Taxation on a flow-through basis, with investors assessed as beneficiaries (and not shareholders). The key deeming rule creates a trust relationship between the CCIV (a legal form company) and those investors who hold shares referable to a particular sub-fund.

  • Each sub-fund is deemed to be a separate unit trust (a CCIV sub-fund trust). The ATO says that this deeming principle requires each CCIV sub-fund to be viewed as a trust for tax purposes. As a result, a deemed CCIV sub-fund trust is recognised as a separate tax entity (despite lacking legal personality).

  • The ATO notes that because these deeming rules apply for the purposes of "all taxation laws", they are intended to have "wide operation" (subject to certain limits on deeming).

  • Where the CCIV sub-fund trust qualifies as an attribution managed investment trust (AMIT), the tax outcomes for investors are the same as those applying to investors in other AMITs. If the AMIT eligibility criteria are not met, the trust income is dealt with in accordance with the general trust provisions (or the public trading trust rules if the CCIV sub-fund trust is a public trading trust).

  • The CCIV regime also includes additional deeming rules to ensure the general trust rules operate appropriately, particularly with respect to the concept of present entitlement. The key rule is that an investor's present entitlement is based on dividends declared during or within three months of the end of the income year.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
Gift this article