India’s incoming GAAR disputes: in conversation with Sanjay Sanghvi

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s incoming GAAR disputes: in conversation with Sanjay Sanghvi

Sanjay Sanghvi resized.jpg

The Khaitan & Co partner also declared that the era of tax planning is over, in an exclusive ITR interview

A wave of Indian litigation related to new general anti-avoidance rules is on its way, Sanjay Sanghvi, a partner at local law firm Khaitan & Co, predicts in an interview with ITR.

GAAR rules are designed to eradicate tax evasion practices, giving authorities the power to deny certain tax benefits to taxpayers.

India’s GAAR rules became effective in April 2017, after first being proposed as part of the country’s Direct Tax Code Bill 2009.

“Since this is relatively new legislation, there are very few reported decisions which have examined the GAAR and its implications,” Sanghvi tells ITR.

However, he highlights one case, which began in 2022 and saw a judgment in June 2024, which he says provides a useful analysis of how India’s courts may approach GAAR issues.

In Ayodhya Rami Reddy Alla v Principal Commissioner of Income Tax at the Telangana High Court, the applicant, Alla, issued bonus shares to a shareholder firm called Ramky Estate and Farms (REF). The shares were then sold to a company named Advisory Services.

Due to the issued bonus shares, the value of each share that REF received was reduced to one-sixth of its previous value, resulting in a short-term capital loss to the applicant.

The applicant attempted to offset the losses against long-term gains made on a separate sale of shares and to file the income under ‘capital gains’ for the 2019/2020 assessment year. This led to the dispute with India’s income tax authority.

“The High Court upheld the tax authority’s action in invoking GAAR provisions on ‘bonus-stripping’ transactions on shares,” Sanghvi says.

“The court observed that the specific anti-avoidance rules (SAAR) for bonus stripping, as provided in the Indian Income Tax Act for the applicable assessment year, do not cover cases of bonus stripping on securities,” he adds.

“Therefore, the taxpayer’s argument that SAAR would override GAAR provisions was held to be incorrect.

“The court also noted that there was clear and convincing evidence to suggest that the entire arrangement was designed with the sole intent of avoiding taxes and hence the tax authorities were justified in invoking GAAR,” Sanghvi says.

Sanghvi predicts that this case represents the tip of the iceberg when it comes to future GAAR-related disputes in India.

“It is widely expected that one will see an increased number of GAAR-related disputes, given the high-stake transactions and commercial and regulatory complications and a desire for tax efficiency, as well as a sometimes-aggressive approach from tax authorities.”

End of an era

With India’s tax authorities seemingly intent on using new GAAR powers to clamp down on tax evasion, Sanghvi says, the concept of “tax planning” has all but diminished.

“To a great extent, the era of tax planning has come to an end,” he states.

“With the introduction of GAAR…there has been an increase in scrutiny and the assessment of transactions by the tax administration to improve tax buoyancy. Practically it’s becoming more and more challenging for taxpayers to do effective tax planning.”

This is especially true given recent transfer pricing (TP) dispute trends, says Sanghvi.

He argues that the Indian tax authorities are “recharacterising” advertising, marketing and promotion expenses as a TP issue, where Indian subsidiaries of foreign parent entities are being compensated on a “cost plus” mark-up basis.

Despite this aggressive attitude from the tax authorities, Sanghvi notes, taxpayers have scored some key wins in India in recent years.

In Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) v ACIT, a much-watched case from 2023, the High Court of Delhi ruled that a tax residency certificate was sufficient for a foreign investor to claim tax benefits based on the India-Singapore tax treaty.

The case provides significant reassurance for foreign investors looking to do business in India, Sanghvi says. However, he notes that the Supreme Court of India has since stayed the judgment, which will cause some uncertainties until a further ruling on the matter.

Sanghvi is due to discuss GAAR-related issues at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit, which is scheduled to take place in Amsterdam on September 10.

To register for ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit, click here.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
All the tax partners elevated across the UK, US and Singapore were private client specialists, continuing a market trend of intense investment and competition
Rolf van de Velde, dubbed ‘an expert chosen by experts’, is tasked with scaling Reptune’s self-service compliance offering
The newly combined firm brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York.
Gift this article