Revised Australian build-to-rent tax concessions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Revised Australian build-to-rent tax concessions

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
monopoly-6851048.jpg

Updated build-to-rent tax concession proposals should encourage foreign investment, but the strict eligibility requirements will restrict the number of qualifying projects, say Jock McCormack and Eddie Ahn of DLA Piper Australia

On June 5 2024, the Australian government introduced the revised version of the tax concessions for build-to-rent (BTR) developments into the Australian Parliament. These concessions comprise:

  • Reducing the final withholding tax from 30% to 15% for distributions to foreign investors by managed investment trusts (MITs) for active BTR developments; and

  • Increasing the capital works tax deduction (e.g., capital expenditure on construction costs) from 2.5% to 4% for active BTR developments.

These new tax concessions were announced in last year’s federal budget (2023–24) and apply to active BTR developments where construction commenced on or after May 9 2023. The revised rules included in two bills follow public consultation on the initial exposure draft legislation that was released in April this year.

Overview

Some key highlights of the updated version of the legislation include:

  • The 15% MIT withholding tax will now apply to both distributions of net rental income and capital gains from the disposal of certain direct or indirect interests in BTR projects by Australian MITs. The inclusion of capital gains is a welcome expansion of the withholding tax concessions.

  • There have been no material changes to the requirements for an active BTR development, which remain as follows:

    • The BTR development’s construction commenced on or after May 9 2023;

    • The BTR development consists of 50 or more dwellings made available for rent to the general public;

    • All the dwellings in the BTR development (including common areas) continue to be directly owned by a single entity for at least 15 years (but not necessarily the same single entity; i.e., the BTR development can be sold to another single entity);

    • Dwellings must be offered for lease terms of at least three years throughout the 15-year period (unless the tenant requests a shorter period); and

    • At least 10% of the dwellings in the BTR development are offered as ‘affordable tenancies’ throughout the 15-year period.

  • A clawback tax (the ‘BTR development misuse tax’) will apply where an eligible BTR development ceases to be eligible during the relevant 15-year period, although the commissioner’s discretion to waive the clawback tax in certain circumstances has now been included (for example, where non-compliance with eligibility criteria is outside an entity’s control). The clawback tax effectively negates the benefit of all the tax concessions obtained up to the cessation time.

  • Furthermore, the MIT withholding tax concession will continue to be available beyond the original 15-year compliance period, provided that all the BTR eligibility conditions (including the affordable tenancies requirement) continue to be satisfied. In contrast, for the capital works deduction concession, only the single-entity holding requirement needs to be satisfied beyond the 15-year period.

  • There are extensive reporting requirements for entities participating in BTR developments, including related to notifying the commissioner of taxation regarding the following events:

    • The commencement of an active BTR development;

    • Expansion, including conversion of an existing building into BTR dwellings;

    • A change of ownership interest; or

    • Ceasing to be an active BTR development.

  • Furthermore, it is important to note that the following properties cannot be an active BTR development: hostels, boarding houses, hotels, motels, and inns.

  • The concessions will apply from July 1 2024, as previously announced.

Comment on the proposed concessions

The authors’ initial observations are that the proposed concessions are a welcome improvement to encourage foreign investment in the emerging Australian BTR sector. However, there is some uncertainty in the practical application of the concessions as to whether the strict requirements for eligible/active BTR developments (including holding MIT structures as referred to in Example 1.6 in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the main bill) may potentially limit the amount of projects that could ultimately qualify for these concessions.

The bills have been referred to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee for review and recommendations.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Gift this article