Brazil proposes bill of law to regulate new selective tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil proposes bill of law to regulate new selective tax

Sponsored by

logo.png
 SIN TAX text in search line. Businessman looking for something at smartphone. SIN TAX concept.

Gabriel Caldiron Rezende of Machado Associados comments on a bill of law presented by the Brazilian Congress that outlines a recently created ‘sin tax’ on goods and services considered harmful to health or the environment

Brazil has recently approved a broad consumption tax reform, which provides for, among other measures, the substitution of the federal excise tax for a ‘sin tax’ on goods and services (the selective tax) considered harmful to health or the environment.

As established by Constitutional Amendment 132/2023, the selective tax is a single-phased federal tax levied on transactions involving goods or services that are deemed harmful to health or the environment, to be defined by law. This tax will not be levied on exports, electricity, or telecommunications.

The selective tax is calculated on top of the net price and will not be included in its own taxable basis. It should be noted that this tax will be included in the taxable basis of the new VATs – goods and services tax (IBS) and contribution on goods and services (CBS) – and, during the transitional period, in the state VAT (ICMS) and municipal service tax (ISS) taxable basis.

Concerns arise over the proposal

Although a sin tax is a modern approach to regulatory taxation, with limited levy on specific goods and services, some concerns arose as Brazilian tax history shows that there is a tendency to unduly use taxes with extra-fiscal aspects (a stimulative function) for the sole purpose of collecting tax revenues, rather than regulating consumption.

As an example, the ICMS, although not an extra-fiscal tax by nature, is guided by the principle of selectivity based on the essentiality of the goods and services; thus, superfluous goods might be subject to higher taxation, while essential goods could (or should) be subject to a lower tax burden.

However, the states imposed a higher tax rate on transactions involving electricity and telecommunication services, which are undoubtedly essential for any activity or individual in the modern day. A case involving the state of Santa Catarina – which imposed a 25% rate on such supplies, as opposed to the regular 17% ICMS rate – was analysed by the Brazilian Federal Court in 2022, which deemed such higher rates unconstitutional. Despite the reasonable outcome, it was a discussion based on a state practice carried out for decades.

Most likely based on this experience, on March 19 2024, the Brazilian Congress presented Bill of Law 29/2024, aiming at regulating the general aspects of the selective tax.

Analysis of the bill of law

For now, the bill of law does not aim at imposing the selective tax, which should be done by another supplementary law. The bill intends to outline the general contours of the selective tax, highlighting its nature of burdening goods and services proven to be harmful to health or the environment.

The text requires that, when the selective tax is instituted, programmatic goals and objectives are established to mitigate the negative impacts of harmful activities, goods, or services, confirming its extra-fiscal character (consumption regulations rather than revenue collection). Furthermore, the supplementary law must provide for mechanisms for the exemption of, offsetting, or reducing the selective tax for taxpayers that promote prevention, mitigation, and awareness actions, and programmes relating to the goods or services taxed, as well as investing in a more sustainable chain of products and services.

To highlight the extra-fiscal nature, the bill of law determines that the supplementary law that imposes the selective tax requires justification in objective data and analysis of economic impacts on other sectors, and observes mechanisms for prior studies, monitoring, and evaluation of its results.

As a consequence, if the programmatic goals and objectives are not achieved, the levy of the selective tax may be suspended until further reassessment, which should ensure public participation.

Another very favourable point of the bill of law is that it requires the definition of different rates according to the essentiality and level of harmfulness of the goods or services taxed. This is an important measure to avoid the imposition of a tax that, by its nature, is regulatory, and merely for revenue purposes. The bill of law proposes a transition for the imposition of the selective tax, with a gradual increase of its rate each year, in the period from 2027 to 2033.

Furthermore, the bill of law provides for cases of non-levy of the selective tax, such as exports, transactions with electrical energy and telecommunications, transactions with products and services linked to energy transition and the reduction of carbon emissions, and goods and services subject to a tax rate reduction under the IBS or the CBS.

The non-levy also applies to transactions involving goods or services derived from, or that have goods and services as an input for or are part of the production chain of, goods or services expressly not subject to the selective tax. If the selective tax was levied in the production chain of expressly non-taxed goods and services, the tax may be used for offsetting against other federal taxes.

Final comment on the regulation

The regulation proposed comes as good news, as it demonstrates an effort to assure the extra-fiscal aspect of the selective tax, avoiding its misuse solely for tax revenue purposes. This is very important as, although the original tax reform bill expressly provided that the selective tax was extra-fiscal, the end text suppressed such provision, which, based on Brazil’s tax history, generated some concerns.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article