China: Shanghai tax authority enhances the advance tax ruling system

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Shanghai tax authority enhances the advance tax ruling system

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
finance

Lewis Lu of KPMG China discusses the recent developments in advance tax rulings in Shanghai as the country moves towards greater tax transparency and certainty

China has been taking steps towards creating a more transparent and predictable tax environment by actively developing its advance tax ruling (ATR) system. A milestone was reached on December 29 2023, when the Shanghai tax authority introduced the Interim Measures for the Administration of Advance Tax Ruling, aimed at governing the ATR system in Shanghai.

Distinctive aspects of the Shanghai ATR system include the following.

Scope of applicability

The Shanghai ATR system extends to all enterprises within Shanghai, regardless of size. This is in contrast to other regions in China, where the ATR system is presently reserved for large enterprises.

Excluded tax matters

Certain tax matters fall outside the purview of ATR. This covers instances where the company does not plan to implement the transaction (for which certainty is sought) within two years, and consequently lacks a detailed project plan. Also excluded are matters or arrangements that lack reasonable business purposes, are already covered by existing tax laws/regulations, or that fall into categories specifically excluded from obtaining rulings.

Application process

Enterprises seeking an ATR can submit their application materials to the Shanghai local tax authority responsible for large enterprise tax matters, either at the municipal or district level. These materials include the application form, informed consent, and supporting evidence documents. Comprehensive details – including the nature of the ruling, the applicant’s position, and the impact on production and taxation – are crucial for a successful application.

Examination and ruling

The accepting tax authority may conduct on-site investigations to ensure compliance with set criteria. In cases related to advanced pricing rulings, the international tax department of the tax authority takes charge.

The measures outline a timeframe for examination, with the primary opinion expected within 30 days of the working group receiving the application, and the leading group’s response within 10 days of receiving the primary opinion. The timeframe for issuing the ruling is yet to be clarified in the measure.

Follow-up administration

The overseeing tax authority will monitor subsequent developments and provide services and management based on the applicant's actual business activities. In the case of significant changes in the ruled matters or alterations in the laws forming the basis of the ruling, the overseeing tax authority can recommend termination or revocation. The applicant must inform the overseeing tax authority of substantial changes within 30 days. The option to reapply for an ATR for anticipated matters is available to the applicant.

Force of law

It is crucial to understand that ATRs are personalised tax services for enterprises and do not constitute administrative acts affecting substantial rights and obligations. ATR results are not applicable for administrative reconsideration or litigation.

Final thoughts on Shanghai’s ATR system

The Shanghai ATR system is expected to benefit a broader range of taxpayers, particularly multinational enterprises, and the top 500 enterprises located in Shanghai (both foreign and Chinese). Given the increasing operational complexity faced by these enterprises, enhancing tax certainty is deemed essential. In parallel, the new Shanghai measure aligns with the Chinese tax authority's commitment to better serve taxpayers.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
The US president has raised India’s tariff rate to 50% because of its importation of Russian oil; in other news, firms made key international tax partner hires
Tax auditors themselves had not been aware of the new TP ‘transaction matrix’ requirements, ITR hears as five German partners share their client experiences
Gift this article