ATO releases critical guidance on software-related payments and intangibles migration arrangements

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ATO releases critical guidance on software-related payments and intangibles migration arrangements

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
Programming code abstract technology background of software deve

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper Australia reviews crucial new government guidance on tax and related issues involved with software licensing and distribution and intangibles migration arrangements

On January 17 2024, the Australian Taxation Office released its updated guidance on firstly, draft Taxation Ruling TR 2024/D1, which deals with the characterisation of payments related to software and related intellectual property rights, and secondly, Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2024/1 on intangibles migration arrangements.

Earlier ATO guidance on the draft ruling and the PGC has effectively been withdrawn.

Firstly, draft TR 2024/D1 provides the ATO’s views on when cross-border payments related to software arrangements are properly regarded as royalties and thus subject to Australian royalty withholding tax. Generally, the characterisation of cross-border payments as royalties will be determined under the relevant double tax agreement definition and/or the section 6(1) definition in the Income Assessment Act 1936.

There has been significant interest in the taxation treatment of software licensing and distribution arrangements for multinational entities and this draft ruling replaces and updates the earlier guidance provided in draft TR 2021/D4. The ATO has also issued a compendium dealing with responses to issues raised with respect to the previous draft ruling.

The ATO provides specific guidance on when cross-border payments will be characterised as a royalty and includes, amongst other things, consideration paid for:

  • The grant of a right to use IP;

  • The use of an IP right;

  • The supply of know-how or assistance to enable the application or enjoyment of the IP; or

  • In certain circumstances, the sale of hardware with embedded software.

The ATO also outlines certain cross-border payments that are not royalties and the likely circumstances in which an apportionment of the consideration between the royalty component and the non-royalty component would be necessary. It also provides various analyses of different scenarios to assist multinational entities.

This draft ruling is critically important for distributors of software-related products and services and the ATO has welcomed comments on the draft ruling on or before March 1 2024.

Secondly, PCG 2024/1, which deals with intangibles migration arrangements, was finalised and released on 17 January 17 2024. It replaces earlier drafts PCG 2021/D4 and PCG 2023/D2 and provides important guidance to multinational entities.

The guidance covers the potential application of Australia’s general anti-avoidance rules (including diverted profits tax) or the transfer pricing rules to cross-border related party arrangements involving the migration of intangible assets, and the mischaracterisation and non-recognition of Australian activities connected with intangible assets.

In the updated guidelines the ATO has provided its risk assessment framework which enables taxpayers to assess their risk profile related to the development, enhancement, maintenance, protection and exploitation of intangibles. Importantly, the ATO provides 15 examples of intangibles migration arrangements and sets out its supporting documentation and other evidence expectations.

The draft Tax Ruling and the updated Practical Compliance Guideline each provide critical guidance to taxpayers on tax and related structuring and risk management issues associated with software licensing/distribution and intangibles migration arrangements.

Further, the PCG 2024/1 is separate from and does not address the proposed multinational tax integrity measure associated with non-deductible payments relating to intangible assets connected with low corporate tax jurisdictions as announced as part of the 2022-23 Australian Budget.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Gift this article