Electronic invoicing in Spain: the first details of the new obligation are revealed

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Electronic invoicing in Spain: the first details of the new obligation are revealed

Sponsored by

Spanish VAT Services logo.jpg
business-5475661.jpg

Fernando Matesanz of Spanish VAT Services examines the proposed requirements and scope of a new compulsory electronic invoicing system in Spain after the publication of a long-awaited draft regulation.

In September 2022, the Spanish legislator published a law to promote business creation and growth. This law – which is not a tax regulation, much less a VAT regulation – indicated that the intention was to make electronic invoicing between businesses or professionals compulsory. Not much more was said officially on the matter, which caused a considerable stir in Spain. There was a message of an imminent new invoicing regulation, but there was no regulation to explain the details of this new obligation.

In June 2023, the draft of the long-awaited regulation was published. Although it is in the public consultation phase, so it cannot be ruled out that some modifications may be introduced, the publication of the document means we are beginning to understand what the Spanish legislator's intentions are and what the scope of application of this new electronic invoicing obligation is.

Key points in the draft regulation

Firstly, everything seems to indicate that the obligation will affect invoicing between businesses or professionals (B2B) when both are established or domiciled in the Spanish territory. In other words, if the issuer or the recipient of the invoice is not a Spanish entity or professional, the new electronic invoicing obligation will not apply. The meaning of this is that, as the system is conceived, invoices will be made accessible on various Spanish public and private platforms. Forcing non-resident entities in Spain to access them seems to be an unnecessary complication.

The new electronic invoicing obligation will not apply to ‘simplified invoices’. It is important to mention that this type of invoice is common in B2C transactions, but in Spain it is also possible to issue them in B2B transactions, provided they do not exceed certain amounts.

In relation to the aforementioned invoicing platforms, their task will be to issue invoices for private platforms that wish to offer this service, but, above all, to exchange them. The platforms must be places that function as a repository of invoices, that can be interconnected among themselves and that can be accessed in order to, in turn, access electronic invoices. This exchange work will also be available through a public platform provided by the Spanish administration. In the case of using a private invoicing platform, a copy of the invoice must always be sent to the public platform.

With regard to the electronic invoice format, and without going into too many technical details, it seems that the formats accepted will be XML, UBL, EDIFACT messages and, what seems to be the administration's preferred option, the ‘Facturae’ system, which is an electronic invoicing system that has existed in Spain for years for invoices issued to public bodies (B2G). The Spanish administration has the infrastructure for this invoice format perfectly in place, and for this reason, this is its preferred system and mandatory in using the public platform. In any case, any e-invoice provider must be able to transform invoices from one format to another.

The Spanish legislator adds an additional requirement, which is the electronic signature of each and every invoice. This seems to be a legislative excess that will most likely have no place in the harmonised definition of electronic invoicing that we will see with the European Commission's VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposal. It is therefore not out of the question that the electronic signature obligation will ultimately be eliminated. However, for the time being, it seems to be a mandatory requirement.

Invoice recipients will have to report the status of their invoices. To this end, the following mandatory statuses are proposed: accepted, rejected and paid, with the possibility of adding other statuses, such as acceptances or partial payments, if so desired.

The mandatory content of invoices remains unchanged. The minimum content of an invoice remains the same, notwithstanding the fact that the parties may voluntarily agree to add certain specifications.

Next steps

As for the entry into force of this new obligation, this will take place, for businesses and professionals whose annual turnover exceeds €8 million (approximately $8.7 million), one year after the regulation has been approved, and for other businesses and professionals, two years after the approval.

At the moment we only have a draft of the regulatory development, which, moreover, is in the process of public consultation. In the best-case scenario, entry into force would take place at the end of 2024 and 2025, respectively. However, considering that Spain is immersed in a national electoral process, it is more than likely that these deadlines will be delayed, which would bring them close to those envisaged by the European Commission for the entry into force of ViDA, provided that they are not delayed either, which cannot be ruled out.

Although some doubts about the content of the electronic invoicing obligation in Spain have been cleared up, the timetable for its entry into force remains uncertain.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Gift this article