Norwegian taxation of cross-border mergers of mutual funds
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Local Insights

Norwegian taxation of cross-border mergers of mutual funds

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
handshake-6598537.jpg

Terje Bogaard of Deloitte Norway examines Norway’s proposed tax rules for cross-border mergers of mutual funds, with potential implications for both Norwegian and European entities.

The Norwegian Ministry of Finance (MoF) has submitted for consultation a proposed enactment of rules for cross-border mergers of mutual funds. The proposed rules allow for a tax exemption on both an investor and fund level if certain conditions are met. Among other things, the merger must be carried out with continuity on tax values. The proposal is a harmonisation with the current rules applicable to cross-border mergers of Norwegian limited liability companies. It provides clarity and predictability on the tax consequences of cross-border mergers.

Current law

Norwegian resident limited liability companies may merge without immediate taxation if certain conditions are met. The rules apply to both domestic mergers and cross-border mergers between entities within the EU/EEA. The main condition is continuity on tax values. For cross-border mergers, continuity on tax values abroad is not required.

Norwegian resident mutual funds may also merge without immediate taxation following the same principles as for limited liability companies. However, this only applies to domestic mergers. A cross-border merger may therefore be taxable for both fund and investors to the extent it is not covered by the Norwegian participation exemption method.

It is possible to apply to the Norwegian MoF for a tax exemption. In numerous cases, tax exemption has been accepted on investor level. There have been conditions that the merger is carried out in accordance with the principles in the prevailing Norwegian tax and legal legislation. Tax continuity on an investor level is required and Norwegian exit-tax rules apply upon emigration from Norway. Applications for tax exemption on fund level have not been accepted.

Proposed rules for cross-border mergers

The proposed new rules allow for cross-border mergers of mutual funds without immediate taxation of either the investors or the fund. The tax exemption only applies to mergers of mutual funds that are UCITS-funds. It is essentially proposed that the cross-border merger rules for limited liability companies shall also apply to mutual funds.

It is required that where the transferring fund is legally established in Norway the merger must be carried out in accordance with the Norwegian Mutual Fund Act (verdipapirfondloven). Mergers where the acquiring fund is legally established in Norway, and mergers between mutual funds legally established abroad, must be carried out in accordance with local legislation which implements the merger provisions of the UCITS-directive.

It follows from the connection to the UCITS-regulations that the mutual funds must be legally established within the EU/EEA. From a Norwegian tax perspective, a mutual fund might be considered tax resident in another state than where it is legally established according to the prevailing legal mutual fund legislation.

In mergers involving a fund that is tax resident in Norway, the other funds must be tax resident within the EU/EEA. If the EU/EEA state is considered a low tax jurisdiction a tax exemption is only accepted if a substance requirement is met. For mergers involving mutual funds tax resident in one or more other states, it is sufficient that the mutual funds are tax resident in a normal tax jurisdiction, or in a low tax jurisdiction within the EU/EEA, if the substance requirement is met.

For tax purposes cross-border mergers of UCITS-funds includes three main types:

  • Mergers where the transferring fund is resident in Norway;

  • Mergers where both transferring and acquiring fund are resident in Norway; and

  • Mergers where the acquiring fund is resident in Norway.

All three types of mergers may entail taxation of Norwegian investors according to the main rule of law.

It is proposed that the new rules shall allow for tax exemptions for Norwegian investors. Continuity on tax values on investor level is a condition (this includes entry values, time of acquisition, among other things). This is in line with the previous tax administrative exemption practice.

The proposal also allows for a tax exemption on a fund level. This is an expansion of previous practice that harmonises with the current rules for cross-border mergers of limited liability companies.

It is a condition that the cross-border merger is carried out with continuity on tax values. The continuity requirement entails that the tax exemption is not definite, but taxation is postponed to a later tax triggering event. However, the participation exemption method may apply on later gains as well.

Exit-tax rules shall apply if assets are transferred out of Norwegian tax jurisdiction. But there is no exit taxation of underlying assets that qualify under the participation exemption method. Exit taxation shall not be considered a breach of the condition of tax continuity.

It is also proposed that merger consideration other than mutual fund units in entities participating in the merger shall be fully taxable. The investor’s right to receive merger consideration other than mutual fund units is significantly limited in Norwegian legislation, which determines that cash consideration may constitute maximum 10% of the share value.

It is proposed that the rules shall take effect as of 2024.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Proposals by HM Revenue and Customs to raise standards in the advisory market are ‘well overdue’, one partner declared
An intimate understanding of a client’s sector is essential to winning new business, a survey of over 28,000 corporate counsel reveals
‘Auditors are failing to perform their core function’ according to a think tank; in other news, White & Case adds a tax partner in Luxembourg
An overhaul of EU import taxes could spell the end of an exemption for cheap parcels
Sharma, managing director for A&M in the United Arab Emirates, tells ITR about intense time pressures, mimicking Jurgen Klopp and what makes tax cool
AI will speed up some of the most laborious TP processes without making human input redundant, argues Hank Moonen, CEO of TaxModel
Firms with a broad geographic reach are more likely to win work, especially from global companies with high turnovers, according to survey data of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
Australian businessman Gordon Merchant used EY’s advice to offset an A$85 million capital gain, according to the Federal Court
Griggs has been drafted in ahead of schedule as the incumbent Tim Ryan departs for Citigroup; while the Netherlands plans to scrap a 15% share buyback tax
Authorities must ensure that Russian firms do not use transfer pricing schemes to increase profits made from oil sold in different markets, advocacy organisations have argued
Gift this article