EY cancels ‘Project Everest’ after months of wrangling
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EY cancels ‘Project Everest’ after months of wrangling

Warsaw/Poland, April 8, 2018: View on EY (formerly Ernst&Young) logo on headquarters

The ‘big four’ firm had wanted to separate tax services between two new audit and consulting businesses, but its global leadership still thinks a split might be necessary.

EY has cancelled ‘Project Everest’ due to opposition from the US executive committee, reported the Financial Times yesterday, April 11.

The global leadership told partners in an internal note that the project had been cancelled, suggesting the group would pursue a different deal. Project Everest would have separated EY’s audit and consulting functions with tax services divided between the two new businesses.

“We have been informed that the US executive committee has decided not to move forward with the design of Project Everest. Given the strategic importance of the US member firm to Project Everest, we are stopping work on the project,” the global leadership told partners in the internal note.

“We acknowledge the challenges with separating some of our businesses that have the deepest technical expertise in a way that gives both organisations the capabilities they need to compete in the market effectively,” they explained.

However, the debate about the future of accounting is not over, especially for auditors and tax professionals. A separation of services is one way to try to prevent conflicts of interest between audits and tax advice.

EY’s global leadership told partners: “We also recognise that we need more time to make the necessary investments to prepare the businesses for a separation.”

The firm’s global leadership decided to go ahead with Project Everest in September 2022, though the early work had already begun in November 2021.

EY originally planned to sell about 15% of the consulting business for more than $10 billion, with another 15% being reserved for staff equity incentives, leaving 70% for partners. Consulting would have dropped the partnership model and become a public company under the plan.

A new consulting company, called NewCo, would have gained 60% of EY’s projected revenue of $42 billion in 2023. The audit arm, named AssureCo, would have taken the remaining 40%. But this division became a focus of intense negotiation in the firm.

The future of tax services was a fundamental question for Project Everest. Auditors stood to gain just 14% of tax services, but US auditors argued for a greater share of up to 20% or 25%. Meanwhile, US consultants had their own arguments for why they should walk away with most of the tax offering.

Yesterday’s announcement was not entirely unexpected – in March, after months of negotiation, EY hit ‘pause’ on the project amid reports of infighting over the details of the separation.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Mexico is advised to eliminate its zero-rating for VAT, Hong Kong cuts stamp duty, road tax rates fall across the OECD and G20, and more
Ulf Johannemann, who has been on trial in Frankfurt since September, was the firm’s most senior tax partner until 2019
Important dates for the Women in Business Law Awards for 2024 revealed
More than 1,000 PwC staff in China and Hong Kong engaged in improper answer sharing, it is understood
Yusuf Akhmadi of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxation reports on the country’s latest domestic and cross-border initiatives to clamp down on tax evasion
The new rate is a blow to Samsung, while two law firms have made significant tax hires into their respective Washington DC offices
Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month