International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian tax update: a new register of foreign ownership and a A$105 million tax fraud case

Sponsored by


Jun Au of DLA Piper Australia analyses the expansion of the existing registers regarding foreign ownership of Australian assets in July 2023 and reports on the ruling in a case concerning sham payroll service entities.

ATO Register of Foreign Ownership

The Australian Tax Office (ATO) has announced that a new Register of Foreign Ownership of Australian Assets (the Register) will be introduced to expand on the existing registers for water interests and agricultural or residential land. Commencing July 1 2023, the Register will record foreign interests in a broader range of Australian land, entities, businesses and assets, with significant penalties for non-compliance.

The legislation governing the new register is Australia’s Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act. This legislation has been in place since 2021 but the commencement date of July 1 2023 for the Register was only recently announced. Draft regulations clarifying the scope of the Register were released for consultation on March 2 2023.

The new obligations are only expected to apply to events after the commencement date, so interests acquired before the Register commences will not need to be registered (unless the ATO makes additional regulations). However, existing obligations to register foreign interests in Australian water, agricultural or residential land and certain other assets still apply.

Registration obligations

Broadly, from July 1 2023, events that must be registered with the ATO may include:

  • Acquisition of a freehold, long lease, mining or agricultural interest;

  • Disposal of the relevant interest;

    Ceasing to be a foreign person; or

  • A decrease or increase of at least 5% of a foreign person's interest in the relevant entity or business.

'Foreign persons' includes individuals not resident in Australia, foreign government investors, corporations and other entities with substantial foreign ownership, including an Australian entity if it has sufficient direct or indirect foreign ownership.

The regime provides for exemptions for security interests taken by financiers, acquisitions from the government, acquisitions by foreign custodian corporations, compulsory acquisitions and passive investments of less than 10% in a land-rich entity.


There may be significant penalties for non-compliance. The penalty for failing to give a register notice on time in the correct form is currently set at A$68,750 (approximately $46,000), though this is expected to increase almost immediately after commencement.

Current ATO registers

The ATO already administers several registers, namely:

  • The agricultural land and water registers – under which a foreign person who has a registrable interest in water or in agricultural land is required to register that interest; and

  • The register of foreign-owned residential land – where registration requirements are imposed as part of the Foreign Investment Review Board approval conditions.

It is expected that the Register will amalgamate and expand these registers when it commences, with ongoing registration obligations.

Review of the managed investment scheme framework by Treasury

The government has announced that Treasury will be tasked with reviewing the managed investment schemes (MIS) regulatory framework. The MIS regime is a common investment vehicle frequently used in Australia by a wide range of investors.

The review will examine whether the existing regulatory framework is fit for purpose, identify potential gaps, and consider what enhancements can be made to reduce undue financial risk for investors. It will consider reform options, focusing on:

  • Whether the thresholds that determine whether an investor is a retail or wholesale client remain appropriate;

  • Whether certain MIS investments should be able to be marketed and sold to retail investors;

  • The various roles and obligations of responsible entities and whether the governance, compliance and risk management frameworks for MIS are appropriate; and

  • Interactions between Commonwealth and State laws when regulating real estate investments by MIS (including issues arising in relation to the failure of the Sterling Income Trust).

Other issues which will be subject to review include:

  • Whether ‘investor rights’ for people who invest in MIS are appropriate;

  • Liquidity requirements for MIS; and

  • Whether an insolvency regime is required for MIS.

Although the scope of the review will not have a tax focus, and is not intended to cover the tax treatment of MIS and investors, certain aspects of the managed investment trust and attribution managed investment trust regimes rely on the Corporations Act definition of a managed investment scheme.

It is anticipated that Treasury will issue a consultation paper by mid-2023.

A$105 million tax fraud case

Four people have been found guilty by the Supreme Court of New South Wales in March 2023 for their roles in a syndicate alleged to have conducted a A$105 million tax fraud over a three-year period.

The conspiracy involved the establishment of numerous sham payroll service entities to divert monies payable to the ATO as pay-as-you-go withholding tax and goods and services tax.

The court found Lauren and Adam Cranston, Dev Menon and Jason Onley guilty of conspiring to defraud the Commonwealth and conspiring to deal with the proceeds of crime valued at A$1 million or more. The maximum penalty they face after being convicted of conspiring to deal in proceeds of crime valued at A$1 million or more is 25 years’ imprisonment.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.