International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Recovery of VAT on bad debts: A positive step for Spain

Sponsored by


Fernando Matesanz of Spanish VAT Services welcomes a Spanish Supreme Court judgment rejecting the excessive formalism of Spanish legislation and indicating alignment with the EU on VAT, but says more should be done.

With the exception of the Spanish special cash accounting scheme, the VAT charged as a result of the supply of goods or services must be paid to the Spanish tax authorities, regardless of whether it has been paid by the recipient of the goods or services.

Notwithstanding the above, the Spanish VAT Law sets forth the possibility to recover the VAT on bad debts, provided a series of strict formal requirements are met.

EU legislation

Some of these requirements are not aligned with the EU VAT legislation; in particular, with Article 90 of the VAT Directive. This article gives member states the option that in cases of total or partial non-payment or reduction of the price of a transaction, the taxable amount shall be reduced by the corresponding amount.

The Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU's) interpretation of that article is that it is the expression of one of the fundamental principles of the VAT Directive, according to which the taxable amount is the consideration actually received. Therefore, the tax authorities may not collect an amount of VAT exceeding the tax that the taxable person received (C-588/10, Kraft Food Polska; C-672/17, Tratave; C-398/20, Elvosporl sro).

According to Article 273 of the VAT Directive, member states are free to establish control mechanisms to verify that VAT has not been received by the taxable person. However, these mechanisms may never be contrary to the principles of neutrality and proportionality. In other words, it is not possible for the control mechanisms put in place by member states to make it impossible or excessively difficult to recover the VAT.

Some of the requirements established by the Spanish rules make it impossible in practice to recover VAT on bad debts and therefore they are not in line with EU legislation and EU case law. This is a reference to:

  • Strict time limitations;

  • The requirement that the recipient of the transaction must be a Spanish entity; or

  • Very strong formal and bureaucratic requirements that the Spanish rules provide for in order to be able to recover the VAT on bad debts.

Spanish Supreme Court ruling

In this regard, on June 2 2022, the Spanish Supreme Court issued an important ruling rejecting the excessive formalism required by the Spanish VAT Law. The case referred to the possibility of requesting collection from the recipient of the transaction by any notarial procedure, without the need for a specific and concrete procedure, as the tax authorities were claiming.

Without going into the details of the notarial procedure chosen, what is relevant in this ruling is that the Supreme Court categorically stated that the excessive formalities required by the Spanish VAT legislation undermine the principle of neutrality, which is a basic principle for the functioning of the common VAT system.

According to the Spanish court, an automatic refusal of a VAT refund of VAT on bad debts based solely on a failure to comply with excessive formalities without the administration having made a minimum evidentiary effort is not acceptable.

Moving towards alignment

The Supreme Court’s decision to follow the line maintained by the CJEU was a positive move. It was not the first time that there have been pronouncements in Spain in this sense, amending through court rulings the excessive formalism of the procedure established by the Spanish legislation. In view of all this, the next step to be taken should be to adapt the Spanish VAT Law to all the doctrine and case law that is applying EU VAT legislation where the Spanish administration has decided not to do so.

It makes no sense to be obliged to engage in lengthy and costly litigation with the administration to recover VAT on bad debts when the EU legislation is clear on the matter. The principle of legal certainty should prevail in these cases and the Spanish lawmaker should accept this as a matter of course.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.