Portuguese patent box regime extended to include registered software copyrights

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portuguese patent box regime extended to include registered software copyrights

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
lisbon-1973531.jpg

Nicole Ribeiro da Rosa of Morais Leitão explains why Portugal’s patent box regime may be one of the most attractive in Europe.

Tax systems are often oriented to promote investment in a particular area. Patent box regimes are one of the most notable examples thereof in that they aim to foster a knowledge-based economy by foreseeing reduced income tax rates to income deriving from R&D activities which produce patents, designs, models, or software rights.

In 2020, 14 out of 27 member states in the EU offered a patent box incentive, certainly with the view to encouraging and attracting the investment in innovation and value-added activities.

Portugal introduced this regime in 2014, with the reform of the Corporate Tax Code, which added Article 50-A to that legal instrument. Initially, the favourable tax treatment was only applicable to income generated through a reduced array of intangibles, namely industrial property rights (patents and industrial designs and models) and consisted in deducting 50% of the gross income deriving therefrom to the taxable profits (the regime was later changed to apply to the net income produced by covered intangibles).

With the State Budget for 2020, the scope of the regime was extended to include registered software copyrights, which made it much more inclusive and aligned with a current value creation trend in the Portuguese economy.

To benefit from the regime, companies must meet certain cumulative requirements which may not be very straightforward, such as (i) using the covered intangibles in a commercial, industrial or agricultural activity; (ii) having separate accounting records for the activities carried out in connection with the covered intangibles; and (ii) the purchaser or user of the covered rights not being domiciled in a tax haven.

In a clear demonstration that it wants to change the paradigm of Portugal as just a country of sun and sea, the Portuguese government introduced in the Budget Proposal for 2022 a very important boost to the regime by increasing the tax deduction from 50% to 85% of the income deriving from covered intangibles, which means that with a corporate tax (and surcharges) at normal effective rates between 21% and 29% this type of income can enjoy effective rates between 3.15% and 4.35%.

It is also noteworthy that Article 50-A of the Corporation Tax Code the income to which the incentive is applicable is assessed by applying the ratio between (i) the total R&D expenses incurred by the company itself, excluding expenses with acquisitions to related entities; (ii) and the total R&D expenses incurred by the company (i.e. the modified nexus approach), but the value of (i) is increased in 30% up to the point where the ratio is 1.

It may be useful to illustrate how the regime works with an example (considering the proposed change in the aforesaid Proposal):

Suppose that a company has a total income €10 million, of which €5 million from patent box qualifying activities and it has total expenses of €4 million, of which €1 million are connected with patent box qualifying activities. The results of applying the Portuguese patent box regime for this company would be:

Determination of the amount of corporation tax

Patent box regime

General regime

Gross income

Expenses from non-qualifying activity

€5 million

-

€5 million

- €3 million

Expenses from qualifying activity

- €1 million

-

Net income

Taxable income

€4 million

€600,000

€2 million

€2 million

Total taxable income

€2.6 million

CIT rate - 21%

€546,000

Municipal Surtax - 1,5%

€39,000

State Surtax

€33,000

Tax assessed

€618,000

Effective tax rates

10.3%

If we consider the proposed new patent box effective corporate tax rate and the rates provided for by other European countries with similar regimes, Portugal will be among those with the best effective rate (considering the rates in force in 2020):


Effective Tax Rates

< 5%

Portugal, Andorra, Belgium, Cyprus, Hungary, Luxembourg, Malta

≥5% e < 10%

Netherlands, Ireland, Lithuania, Poland

≥10%

France, Italy, Turkey, Spain, Slovakia, UK

Variable

San Marino, Switzerland

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Multinationals importing goods into Brazil may need to align TP files and customs documentation more closely as authorities gain new tools to challenge related-party transactions
The private equity-backed deal hands Grant Thornton immediate and impressive US scale, but World Tax data suggests the firm still has work to do to gain recognition
From Instagram content to £100m transactions, the founder of Thomas & Co International discusses building a modern tax and accounting firm for business founders
Growing GAAR scrutiny is driving taxpayers to look beyond legal form and demonstrate the commercial rationale underpinning tax-efficient structures
Pillar two has been clients’ ‘biggest headache’ but also a driver of growth for MHA, which believes it has the edge over its big four rivals
Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
Gift this article