Portuguese patent box regime extended to include registered software copyrights
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portuguese patent box regime extended to include registered software copyrights

Sponsored by

sponsored-firm-mlgts.jpg
lisbon-1973531.jpg

Nicole Ribeiro da Rosa of Morais Leitão explains why Portugal’s patent box regime may be one of the most attractive in Europe.

Tax systems are often oriented to promote investment in a particular area. Patent box regimes are one of the most notable examples thereof in that they aim to foster a knowledge-based economy by foreseeing reduced income tax rates to income deriving from R&D activities which produce patents, designs, models, or software rights.

In 2020, 14 out of 27 member states in the EU offered a patent box incentive, certainly with the view to encouraging and attracting the investment in innovation and value-added activities.

Portugal introduced this regime in 2014, with the reform of the Corporate Tax Code, which added Article 50-A to that legal instrument. Initially, the favourable tax treatment was only applicable to income generated through a reduced array of intangibles, namely industrial property rights (patents and industrial designs and models) and consisted in deducting 50% of the gross income deriving therefrom to the taxable profits (the regime was later changed to apply to the net income produced by covered intangibles).

With the State Budget for 2020, the scope of the regime was extended to include registered software copyrights, which made it much more inclusive and aligned with a current value creation trend in the Portuguese economy.

To benefit from the regime, companies must meet certain cumulative requirements which may not be very straightforward, such as (i) using the covered intangibles in a commercial, industrial or agricultural activity; (ii) having separate accounting records for the activities carried out in connection with the covered intangibles; and (ii) the purchaser or user of the covered rights not being domiciled in a tax haven.

In a clear demonstration that it wants to change the paradigm of Portugal as just a country of sun and sea, the Portuguese government introduced in the Budget Proposal for 2022 a very important boost to the regime by increasing the tax deduction from 50% to 85% of the income deriving from covered intangibles, which means that with a corporate tax (and surcharges) at normal effective rates between 21% and 29% this type of income can enjoy effective rates between 3.15% and 4.35%.

It is also noteworthy that Article 50-A of the Corporation Tax Code the income to which the incentive is applicable is assessed by applying the ratio between (i) the total R&D expenses incurred by the company itself, excluding expenses with acquisitions to related entities; (ii) and the total R&D expenses incurred by the company (i.e. the modified nexus approach), but the value of (i) is increased in 30% up to the point where the ratio is 1.

It may be useful to illustrate how the regime works with an example (considering the proposed change in the aforesaid Proposal):

Suppose that a company has a total income €10 million, of which €5 million from patent box qualifying activities and it has total expenses of €4 million, of which €1 million are connected with patent box qualifying activities. The results of applying the Portuguese patent box regime for this company would be:

Determination of the amount of corporation tax

Patent box regime

General regime

Gross income

Expenses from non-qualifying activity

€5 million

-

€5 million

- €3 million

Expenses from qualifying activity

- €1 million

-

Net income

Taxable income

€4 million

€600,000

€2 million

€2 million

Total taxable income

€2.6 million

CIT rate - 21%

€546,000

Municipal Surtax - 1,5%

€39,000

State Surtax

€33,000

Tax assessed

€618,000

Effective tax rates

10.3%

If we consider the proposed new patent box effective corporate tax rate and the rates provided for by other European countries with similar regimes, Portugal will be among those with the best effective rate (considering the rates in force in 2020):


Effective Tax Rates

< 5%

Portugal, Andorra, Belgium, Cyprus, Hungary, Luxembourg, Malta

≥5% e < 10%

Netherlands, Ireland, Lithuania, Poland

≥10%

France, Italy, Turkey, Spain, Slovakia, UK

Variable

San Marino, Switzerland

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
In the wake of the global rankings release, we focus on the top performers across EMEA in the second of three regional analyses
Gift this article