Australian election triggers update on international tax policies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian election triggers update on international tax policies

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
amber-weir-ul0hbkwlrf4-unsplash.jpg

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper Australia discusses the four key initiatives to tackle multinational tax avoidance announced by the Labor opposition ahead of Australia’s general election.

Ahead of the Australian General Election on May 21 2022, the Labor opposition has announced a four-pronged international tax policy which is described as ‘a responsible and measured multinational tax integrity package’.

In a joint media release by the Shadow Treasurer, the Honourable Jim Chalmers MP and the Shadow Assistant Treasurer and Shadow Assistant Minister for Treasury, Labor has highlighted its four key initiatives to tackle multinational tax avoidance as follows:

1. Fully supporting the OECD’s two pillar solution including a 15% minimum tax on global profits. Labor recognises the need to address the digitalisation of our economies and with a greater emphasis on taxing related profits where the products or services are sold.

2. Limiting debt – related deductions of multinationals at 30% of profits, while preserving the arm’s-length test and the worldwide gearing ratio.  While there is limited detail provided in the media release, the interaction with Australia’s thin capitalisation rules requires further clarification particularly as to the practical application of the arm’s-length debt amount test and the safe harbour test.  The reforms are intended to apply from July 1 2023.

3. Limiting the ability to access concessional treaty withholding taxes on payments made to recognised tax havens (for example Cayman Islands, Bermuda) for the use of intellectual property held in those tax havens.  Deductions for these payments will be denied unless taxpayers can substantiate that the royalty payments are not for the dominant purpose of tax avoidance. While Labor will consult on these proposed rules, it is anticipated that these rules will be applicable from July 1 2023.

4. Further initiatives enhancing transparency on international tax structures including a public registry of ultimate beneficial ownership, mandatory reporting of tax haven exposure to shareholders and related initiatives in relation to being eligible to participate in government tenders will be introduced by Labor.

Labor is forecasting additional revenues from these international tax measures to raise approximately AU$1.89 billion over the next four years which will assist in repairing the budget, preventing profit shifting and evening the playing field for Australian businesses.  If enacted, this combination of measures will materially increase the ATO’s armoury to address multinational tax avoidance.

Uber Technologies Inc case and legal professional privilege: In-house counsel

Although not a tax specific case and following on from our previous article, in-house lawyers are reminded of the heavier onus of proof to confirm that its internal communications are privileged, as opposed to proving privilege in communications involving external counsel.

While noting that in-house counsel need to have the appropriate degree of independence, the role and structure of the particular in-house legal team will have a guiding impact on whether privilege should apply to their advice – noting amongst other things that in-house lawyers may have a broader strategic or commercial role in particular companies.

Australia–India economic co-operation trade agreement

As part of the broad Australia-India economic co-operation trade agreement, Australia has agreed in principle to amend its domestic taxation law to remove the taxation of offshore income of Indian businesses providing essentially technical services to Australian businesses.  

The practical application of the Australia–India double tax treaty pursuant to the royalties article (Article 12) has been a major concern for Indian services providers particularly since the Satyam Computer Services Limited v. FCT (2018) 108 ATR 822 Case, and it appears in principle that Australia has agreed to a unilateral solution.

The Australian and Indian governments exchanged letters dealing with these proposed amendments to Australian domestic law in April 2022 and we expect this reform to be implemented in the coming months.

 

Jock McCormack

Partner, DLA Piper Australia

E: jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com


more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Overall revenues and average profit per partner also increased in the UK, the ‘big four’ firm revealed
Increasingly complex reporting requirements contributed towards the firm’s growth in tax, it said
Sector-specific business taxes, private equity tax treatment reform and changes to the taxation of non-residents are all on the cards for the UK, authors from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer predict
The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
Gift this article