International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Advantages of implementing operational transfer pricing

Sponsored by

The concept of OTP has been evolving

Carlos Pérez Gómez and Dan Paul Hernández de Aguirre of HLB MAAT Asesores explain the benefits of having an operational transfer pricing process.

The latest legislation updates applicable for transfer pricing (TP) purposes in Mexico and worldwide represent a challenge regarding the correct registry and transfer prices implementation as part of the accounting and economic processes for multinational groups that could be solved through technology. This is emphasised as the operations of the multinational group and the TP framework are becoming more complex and extensive in all countries, as well as a significant and growing perception of risks in TP areas by the tax authorities.

The OECD, through the BEPS project, foresees a series of actions as a reference to adequately handle the data from multinational companies, coherence of internal policies, reinforcement of substantial requirements in current international standards and the improvement of transparency. This is the case of Action 13, which requires significant qualitative (local file and master file) and quantitative information (CbC Report), which once again grants the multinational companies an opportunity to strengthen procedures with quality standards, adequate data management as well as being able to efficiently portray the impact concerning TP on the taxable income of the entities that are part of the multinational group.

The Actions of the BEPS Plan propose the implementation of TP policies in a comprehensive context, as well as efficient data management and double taxation risks, to find better decisions and multilateral agreements, thus giving a greater motivation to review the operational transfer pricing (OTP) process.

The OTP is a comprehensive process consisting of a series of steps which begin by identifying and analysing the intercompany transactions, conducting a compliance analysis, to the financial reporting and registration process to ensure solid monitoring, maintenance and continuous analysis of the process ‘from end-to-end’ and the resulting repercussions on TP, preventing subsidiaries from managing their TP policies locally and differently to reduce the risk of unilateral adjustments and possible unduly exposure to tax risks.

The design and planning of TP policies is essential because it provides guidelines for the application of how intercompany transactions should be established in an economic, legal, commercial and consistent sense with applicable laws, as well as avoiding the disparities affecting the reported numbers, which may translate into TP adjustments at the end of the fiscal year or the possibility of double taxation, penalties and/or prolonged audits that create significant disruptions.

Some fundamental elements in the planning and design of TP policies are the following:

  • A global TP policy supported by an appropriate economic analysis as well as consistent with the factual depiction of functions, assets, risks, and intellectual property of the related parties;

  • Intercompany agreements between the entities involved focused on the background of the transactions in order to mitigate the risks of incorrect conceptualisation;

  • A global management framework, as well as analysis and supervision processes that determine and facilitate compliance with TP policies; and

  • Updated documentation showing that the established policies applied comply with the ‘arm’s-length’ principle by the end of the fiscal year.

At the planning and design level, the mechanism to carry out these policies efficiently and consciously is (i) defining the main risk areas; (ii) identifying the flows of intercompany transactions; (iii) establishing the technical valuation process in which various economic methods are identified; and (iv) the evaluation of the operational impact on the flexibility of a given policy choice.

The functionality of the internal systems of each company (i.e. enterprise resource planning) must cover the specific needs, without leaving behind the impact on its accounting and fiscal requirements of intercompany operations, such as invoicing, electronic accounting or analytical work papers, in accordance with the legislation of each country.

OTP focuses on proactive analysis and monitoring that is executed continuously in order to identify any problem on time and to be able to solve it efficiently. An adaptable solution allows a company to identify TP risks in a timely manner, determine adjustments and avoid indirect tax problems, always distinguishing a proactive approach rather than a reactive one.

An efficient OTP will be one that aligns the TP objectives with the commercial ones, promoting compliance with each applicable legislation, reducing complexity, providing strategies and promoting better decisions at all times.

The key factors in achieving an efficient OTP system rest on the management framework, the designated owner of the global TP process, the operational design of the OTP model, and technology adaptability solutions.

The operational design of the OTP model is an essential element in the OTP system, since it is the resource through which the data included in the system will be analysed, therefore it is necessary to map the data process and divide it into four phases: (i) identification of intercompany transactions; (ii) determination of prices and costs; (iii) registration process for reports; and (iv) monitoring, maintenance and analysis to ensure that these measures are reviewed and applied according to the inputs and results of the system.

The concept of OTP has been evolving and it has become relevant in processes involving TP and technology, due to the need to clean inconsistencies in the data and thus the coherence of the TP analysis.

For the effective application of an OTP, it is important to be realistic and have full knowledge of the business and the problem to be solved because, by doing so, there is a good chance of having a long-term benefit. This, without a doubt, must be complemented by an in-depth analysis of the TP structure, characterisation of the entities and the previously established compensation mechanisms.

Having an OTP will significantly help towards providing an accurate and timely response to questions and requirements made by the tax authorities, reducing response times and the administrative burden required in these processes.


Carlos Pérez Gómez

Partner, HLB MAAT Asesores



Dan Paul Hernández de Aguirre

Director, HLB MAAT Asesores


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.