All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Switzerland: Supreme Court restricts the application of the Swiss Old Reserves practice

Sponsored by

Swiss Old Reserves practice restricted to cases of tax avoidance

René Zulauf and Manuel Angehrn of Deloitte Switzerland explain why the restriction of the Swiss Old Reserves practice to cases of tax avoidance is a welcome move.

To prevent treaty shopping, the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA) universally applies the so-called Swiss Old Reserve practice based on a schematic asset/liability test: if there are distributable reserves/retained earnings prior to the transfer of shares from a jurisdiction with a higher residual withholding tax to a jurisdiction with a lower one, the previous higher rate still applies on these reserves/retained earnings. 

The Swiss Supreme Court had to review the application of the Swiss Old Reserves practice in a recent case. While the court upheld the application of the practice in principle, it ruled that it should be restricted to cases of actual tax avoidance. For tax avoidance, three conditions need to be fulfilled cumulatively.

  • Objective requirement: The taxpayer used structuring that is unusual, unnecessarily onerous and complex.

  • Subjective requirement: The taxpayer chose this structuring with the sole intent of achieving a (Swiss) tax benefit (and it provides no other meaningful economic benefit or purpose).

  • Actual tax saving:  An actual tax benefit could have been achieved through the structuring. 

It is therefore up to the tax authorities to prove tax avoidance based on the three points above. 

The Supreme Court decision is far-reaching in that it should significantly restrict the present universal application of the Old Reserves practice. To be able to impose Old Reserves, the SFTA would have to prove tax avoidance in each individual case in future.

In particular, the SFTA would have to be able to sufficiently prove that the structuring was done with the sole intent of avoiding Swiss withholding tax and that it provides no other meaningful economic benefit or purpose. 

In cases of a global restructuring, where, for instance, a US group is putting all its European subsidiaries under a new European holding company, it should in principle no longer be possible to impose Old Reserves, as the sole purpose of such a restructuring is clearly not to avoid Swiss withholding tax but to obtain many other benefits.

We very much welcome the restriction of the Swiss Old Reserves practice to cases of tax avoidance. This is another step towards making Switzerland even more attractive as an international holding jurisdiction.


René Zulauf

Partner, Deloitte Switzerland



Manuel Angehrn

Senior manager, Deloitte Switzerland



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Biden administration is about to give $80 billion to the Internal Revenue Service to enhance the tax authority’s enforcement processes and IT systems.
Audi, Porsche, and Kia say their US clients will face higher prices under the Inflation Reduction Act after the legislation axes an important tax credit for electric vehicle production.
This week Brazil’s former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva came out in support of uniting Brazil’s consumption taxes into one VAT regime, while the US Senate approved a corporate minimum tax rate.
The Dutch TP decree marks a turn in the Netherlands as the country aligns its tax policies with OECD standards over claims it is a tax haven.
Gorka Echevarria talks to reporter Siqalane Taho about how inflation, e-invoicing and technology are affecting the laser printing firm in a post-COVID world.
Tax directors have called on companies to better secure their data as they generate ever-increasing amounts of information due to greater government scrutiny.
Incoming amendments to the treaty could increase costs on non-resident Indian service providers.
Experts say the proposed minimum tax does not align with the OECD’s pillar two regime and risks other countries pulling out.
The Malawian government has targeted US gemstone miner Columbia Gem House, while Amgen has successfully consolidated two separate tax disputes with the Internal Revenue Service.
ITR's latest quarterly PDF is now live, leading on the rise of tax technology.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree