Proposed employee stock option rules for the Netherlands

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Proposed employee stock option rules for the Netherlands

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
The new employee stock option rules should enter into force on January 1 2022

Jian-Cheng Ku and Ilse Lagerweij of DLA Piper Netherlands discuss the proposed rules that amend the wage tax treatment of employee stock options.

On May 31 2021 a legislative proposal regarding the treatment of employee stock options was published by the Dutch government for public consultation. 

The newly proposed rules amend the wage tax treatment of employee stock options to stimulate the issuance of such stock options. Under the newly proposed rules taxation on employee stock options can be deferred until the option is tradeable instead of taxation when exercising the stock option. The consultation period ends on June 30 2021.

Current rules

If an employee is granted an employee stock option this is considered wage for the purpose of the Dutch Wage Tax Act. Currently, wage tax will be imposed when exercising or selling the stock option.

The taxable amount is determined by the fair market value of the employee stock option at the point of taxation, minus the consideration that the employee paid for the stock option (if any).

The Dutch government already provided for a beneficial rule under the current legislation to support start-ups and scale-ups in attracting qualified personnel by stimulating issuance employee stock options. However, the beneficial rule did not have the desired impact as start-ups and scale-ups hardly applied for it. Hence the newly proposed rules have a more generic character to ensure impact.

Currently, only 75% of the fair market value of an employee stock option package is taken into account insofar the employee stock option is not valued at more than €50,000 (approximately $60,000) and (i) the employer has a so-called R&D declaration (S&O verklaring); and (ii) a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of five years have passed after granting the stock option.

Proposed rules

Under the new rules, taxation can be deferred by the introduction of a new taxation moment: when the stock option is tradeable. The taxpayer can also choose to opt out.

The stock option is considered tradeable from the moment that the employee has the right to sell the stock option. This is also the case if the employee can sell the stock option under restrictions, such as a limitation to solely sell the shares to other employees of the company. 

Taxation can only be deferred up to a maximum of five years. To avoid long-term deferral all stock options are considered tradeable after this period. 

The new employee stock option rules should enter into force on January 1 2022.

Purpose

The purpose of the more generic new rules is to grant a liquidity benefit to employees with employee stock options by deferring the taxable moment to the moment they have the possibility to sell. 

This should support start-ups and scale-ups with finding qualified personnel by offering a competitive incentive plan to employees. As the application of the new rule is not subject to requirements, non-start-up or scale-up taxpayers are also eligible to apply for taxation at the moment the stock option is tradeable. 

Although the newly proposed rules provide for more flexibility to employees, it is important to realise that the taxable amount is determined on the basis of the fair market value of the stock options at the moment taxation is triggered. 

If the fair market value has increased substantially between exercising the stock option and when the stock option becomes tradeable, more wage tax might be due if the taxpayer is taxed when the stock option is tradeable. This is something to keep in mind, especially in cases where new (and higher) valuations of stocks are to be expected, e.g. series A or B funding and in case of impending IPO.

Jian-Cheng Ku

Partner, DLA Piper

E: jian-cheng.ku@dlapiper.com

 

Ilse Lagerweij

Associate, DLA Piper 

E: ilse.lagerweij@dlapiper.com

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article