All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Cryptocurrencies make an appearance in Chilean income tax filing

Chilean tax approach to cryptocurrencies and cryptoassets is not very comprehensive

Sandra Benedetto and Jonatan Israel of PwC Chile consider Chile’s approach to taxing cryptocurrencies and cryptoassets.

The Chilean yearly income tax return has seen some changes in fiscal year 2021. The first and most notable one is that the term for income tax filing has been extended. The Ministry of Finance (MoF) announced that the term for filing yearly income tax returns will be extended until May 31 2021 to help taxpayers with tax compliance obligations in light of the challenges that COVID-19 has caused. 

However, the extension of the filing term is not the only surprise for taxpayers. In a year where the prices of bitcoin, ether and even dogecoin have skyrocketed, taxpayers, particularly those that invest in cryptocurrencies would have seen a pop-up on the Chilean Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) website, when filing the annual tax return. This pop-up gave taxpayers notice that any transactions in cryptocurrencies were being included in the 2021 income tax filing for the purposes of calculating income tax due for this fiscal year. 

This should come as no surprise, since the IRS has included a reference to the taxation of cryptocurrencies since 2019, when issuing the guidance for annual income tax filing. It should be noted that the instructions set forth in the annual guide, only refer to the capital gains and losses derived from transactions in cryptocurrencies alongside repeating the general criteria on the matter that the IRS has adopted. 

For those who are not familiar with the Chilean tax system, the inclusion of this pop-up is in line with  the IRS’ flow of financial information received from several private and public entities, in this particular case, the entities that act as intermediaries of digital assets. The intermediaries of digital assets alongside all financial intermediaries, are obligated to report the sales and purchases transactions of digital assets. This obligation has been in force since FY2019.   

Overall, the Chilean tax approach to cryptocurrencies and cryptoassets is, to say the least, not very comprehensive. For those keeping count, the IRS has only made refer to the tax consequences of transactions involved in cryptocurrencies in four administrative rulings. Besides that, and to this date, the IRS has not issued any formal and comprehensive guidance. The first of these rulings was issued in 2018, coming four years after the first guidance issued by the IRS and HMRC in 2014. The last of these rulings was issued in 2020.   

Considering the astoundingly fast development of the underlying technology since its inception, i.e. blockchain and distributed ledger, these administrative pronouncements seem only to touch the tip of the iceberg in what seems to be an ever-growing amount of tax challenges that cryptoassets pose. 

In broad terms, the administrative pronouncements of the IRS address the following initial areas of concern that all tax administrations face when dealing with cryptocurrencies:

  • Their legal nature;

  • The taxation of capital gains derived from the sale;

  • The timing for income recognition;

  • Inventory recognition method;

  • VAT treatment; and

  • Taxation of the intermediaries or exchanges for their services. 

The IRS’ interpretations of the above have been reasonable and in line with general Chilean tax principles. However there are many other tax questions that are still left unanswered, starting with the taxation applicable to miners and forgers, the questions of barter transaction when tokens are exchanged for services or other goods, what happens in case of hard forks, what happens with non-fungible tokens, and the list continues. 

Unlike the referred pop-up that taxpayers got, the interest that tax authorities have shown on the income, capital gains, and generally speaking other taxable events that are derived from cryptotransactions is well expected and in line with what other tax administrations are doing.

Chilean tax developments in these matters should be closely monitored by all kind of investors that have their eye – like the rest of the world has – on cryptoassets. 

Sandra Benedetto

Partner, PwC Chile

E: sandra.benedetto@pwc.com

 

Jonatan Israel

Manager, PwC Chile

E: jonatan.israel@pwc.com

 

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Incoming amendments to the treaty could increase costs on non-resident Indian service providers.
Experts say the proposed minimum tax does not align with the OECD’s pillar two regime and risks other countries pulling out.
The Malawian government has targeted US gemstone miner Columbia Gem House, while Amgen has successfully consolidated two separate tax disputes with the Internal Revenue Service.
ITR's latest quarterly PDF is now live, leading on the rise of tax technology.
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted firms, teams, and practitioners for the 2022 Americas Tax Awards – winners to be announced on September 22
‘Care’ is the operative word as HMRC seeks to clamp down on transfer pricing breaches next year.
Tax directors tell ITR that the CRA’s clampdown on unpaid taxes on insurance premiums is causing uncertainty for businesses as they try to stay compliant.
HMRC has informed tax directors that it will impose automated assessments on online sellers with inaccurate VAT returns, in a bid to fight fraud.
UK businesses need to reset after the Upper Tribunal ruled against BlackRock over interest deductions it claimed on $4 billion in inter-company loans, say sources.
Hong Kong SAR’s incoming regime for foreign income exemptions could remove it from an EU tax watchlist but hand Singapore top spot in APAC.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree