International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cryptocurrencies make an appearance in Chilean income tax filing

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
Chilean tax approach to cryptocurrencies and cryptoassets is not very comprehensive

Sandra Benedetto and Jonatan Israel of PwC Chile consider Chile’s approach to taxing cryptocurrencies and cryptoassets.

The Chilean yearly income tax return has seen some changes in fiscal year 2021. The first and most notable one is that the term for income tax filing has been extended. The Ministry of Finance (MoF) announced that the term for filing yearly income tax returns will be extended until May 31 2021 to help taxpayers with tax compliance obligations in light of the challenges that COVID-19 has caused. 

However, the extension of the filing term is not the only surprise for taxpayers. In a year where the prices of bitcoin, ether and even dogecoin have skyrocketed, taxpayers, particularly those that invest in cryptocurrencies would have seen a pop-up on the Chilean Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) website, when filing the annual tax return. This pop-up gave taxpayers notice that any transactions in cryptocurrencies were being included in the 2021 income tax filing for the purposes of calculating income tax due for this fiscal year. 

This should come as no surprise, since the IRS has included a reference to the taxation of cryptocurrencies since 2019, when issuing the guidance for annual income tax filing. It should be noted that the instructions set forth in the annual guide, only refer to the capital gains and losses derived from transactions in cryptocurrencies alongside repeating the general criteria on the matter that the IRS has adopted. 

For those who are not familiar with the Chilean tax system, the inclusion of this pop-up is in line with  the IRS’ flow of financial information received from several private and public entities, in this particular case, the entities that act as intermediaries of digital assets. The intermediaries of digital assets alongside all financial intermediaries, are obligated to report the sales and purchases transactions of digital assets. This obligation has been in force since FY2019.   

Overall, the Chilean tax approach to cryptocurrencies and cryptoassets is, to say the least, not very comprehensive. For those keeping count, the IRS has only made refer to the tax consequences of transactions involved in cryptocurrencies in four administrative rulings. Besides that, and to this date, the IRS has not issued any formal and comprehensive guidance. The first of these rulings was issued in 2018, coming four years after the first guidance issued by the IRS and HMRC in 2014. The last of these rulings was issued in 2020.   

Considering the astoundingly fast development of the underlying technology since its inception, i.e. blockchain and distributed ledger, these administrative pronouncements seem only to touch the tip of the iceberg in what seems to be an ever-growing amount of tax challenges that cryptoassets pose. 

In broad terms, the administrative pronouncements of the IRS address the following initial areas of concern that all tax administrations face when dealing with cryptocurrencies:

  • Their legal nature;

  • The taxation of capital gains derived from the sale;

  • The timing for income recognition;

  • Inventory recognition method;

  • VAT treatment; and

  • Taxation of the intermediaries or exchanges for their services. 

The IRS’ interpretations of the above have been reasonable and in line with general Chilean tax principles. However there are many other tax questions that are still left unanswered, starting with the taxation applicable to miners and forgers, the questions of barter transaction when tokens are exchanged for services or other goods, what happens in case of hard forks, what happens with non-fungible tokens, and the list continues. 

Unlike the referred pop-up that taxpayers got, the interest that tax authorities have shown on the income, capital gains, and generally speaking other taxable events that are derived from cryptotransactions is well expected and in line with what other tax administrations are doing.

Chilean tax developments in these matters should be closely monitored by all kind of investors that have their eye – like the rest of the world has – on cryptoassets. 

Sandra Benedetto

Partner, PwC Chile

E: sandra.benedetto@pwc.com

 

Jonatan Israel

Manager, PwC Chile

E: jonatan.israel@pwc.com

 

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF has warned Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.