International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Growth of advanced pricing agreements in Mexico

Sponsored by

eygreece.png
The TP landscape in Mexico has developed in a positive way

Ricardo Barbieri and Ricardo Cruz of EY Mexico consider why advanced pricing agreements in Mexico have significantly increased in the last decade.

Over the last 25 years, the transfer pricing (TP) landscape in Mexico has developed in a positive way. Information provided by the Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personales (INAI) shows that the Mexican Tax Authority (Servicio de Administración Tributaria, SAT) has significantly increased its advanced pricing agreement (APA) cases within the last decade and this is likely to continue to grow in the coming years.

This is a consequence of the current environment, because businesses have been evolving making those more complex, competitive and challenging, due to new technologies, but also due to the existence of new competitors, ways to conduct operations, value added and consumers’ preferences.

A more globally integrated market has a constant flow of products, intangibles, services and financial instruments that move across borders and business units. So, tax authorities and regulatory entities around the world are permanently cooperating to share information about multinational enterprises (MNEs). In this environment, companies need to have globally consistent TP methodologies that help mitigate the risks derived from a tax audit and avoid double taxation issues.

Consequently, it is essential for MNEs to analyse the inter-company arrangements beyond the individual transaction and include into the equation the value chain, intangibles, services and other variables that might have an impact into the pricing. Since this is evolving into more complex TP analyses, the SAT has been proactively seeking to pursue APA or bilateral APA (BAPA) discussions.

An APA is a lengthy administrative procedure from a taxpayer’s perspective (current statistics support this argument). On average, an APA negotiation can take approximately 3.5 years, while a BAPA negotiation usually takes an additional year to such term, on average.  However, the upside to this procedure is the legal certainty to reach an arm’s-length outcome on this negotiation with the SAT, under a friendly controversial environment, as opposed to a TP audit over one or several inter-company transactions which could, in turn, trigger significant adjustments, penalties, surcharges and inflation updates.

Although most of the current APAs are related to maquiladora cases, it is not uncommon to have other cases in Mexico, especially for transactions where there could be several critical assumptions that would be advisable to be discussed in advance with the tax authorities, in order to gain some clarity on what their view might be on a specific situation.  

As an example, the financial and economic impact derived from the COVID-19 pandemic could have negative consequences on TP policies that might not necessarily imply there is a risk on deviating from the arm’s-length standard on inter-company transactions but rather a sudden change in circumstances within the taxpayers’ industry.  Therefore, it would be advisable to discuss these impacts ex ante with the SAT as opposed to having potential questionings from sharp profitability variations when comparing TP informative returns over the last few years. 

As of December 2020, the SAT issued 764 APAs in the last decade, mostly negotiated as part of the maquiladora regime during the 2014–2017 period throughout the Qualified Maquiladora Agreement jointly developed and negotiated between Mexico and the US tax authorities.  

Figure 1

mexico-ey-pie-1.gif

Table 1

APAs issued as of December 2020

Year  

 Non-maquila APAs 

 Maquila APAs 

2011

9

0

2012

9

4

2013

5

0

2014

3

1

2015

6

7

2016

4

13

2017

2

328

2018

9

290

2019

2

63

2020

2

7

On the other hand, as of December 2020, the SAT continues to negotiate 788 APAs, most of them being part of the renewal procedure for maquiladoras in order to comply with current TP regulations in Mexico.

Figure 2

mexico-ey-pie-2.gif

Moreover, the SAT has been continuously engaging in BAPA negotiations with other foreign tax authorities over the last decade.  Most of these bilateral rulings have been negotiated with the IRS, and with other tax jurisdictions such as Germany, Japan and Switzerland.

Figure 3

united-states.svg

USA

16

germany.svg

Germany

1

japan.svg

Japan

1

switzerland.svg

Switzerland

1

It is logical to expect that, over the coming years, the SAT will continue to negotiate BAPAs with a significantly higher number of competent tax authorities across several jurisdictions. As of 2020, BAPAs negotiations between the SAT and other jurisdictions continue and the BAPA cases have increased as seen in Figure 4.

Figure 4

united-states.svg

USA

25

japan.svg

Japan

4

germany.svg

Germany

2

netherlands.svg

Netherlands

1

sweden.svg

Sweden

3

switzerland.svg

Switzerland

4

south-korea.svg

South Korea

2

italy.svg

Italy

1

Under the current economic situation and the TP implications mentioned above, it is only natural to expect taxpayers’ willingness to come forward and start engaging in TP discussions with the SAT officials soon.  This certainly will result in an additional challenge for the SAT in order to conclude the ongoing open cases, while trying to review and start discussions on new cases due within the next few months. 

 

Ricardo Barbieri

Transfer pricing partner, EY

E: ricardo.barbieri@mx.ey.com

Ricardo Cruz 

Transfer pricing partner, EY

E: ricardo-manuel.Cruz@mx.ey.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.